Talk:Porcupine family: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:01, 14 May 2025 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,921 edits Re ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:30, 14 May 2025 view source VectorGraphics (talk \| contribs) 2,403 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	::: 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine has been documented. No one's saying it should be removed, so it's not being "obscured". Septimal porcupine is very natural: it extends 5-limit porcupine without changing the complexity, accuracy, or optimal tuning much. Thus, it is canon. "Porcupine has no other reasonable mapping of 11" is true but is besides the point cuz not everyone has to be interested in the 11-limit. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 09:01, 14 May 2025 (UTC)		::: 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine has been documented. No one's saying it should be removed, so it's not being "obscured". Septimal porcupine is very natural: it extends 5-limit porcupine without changing the complexity, accuracy, or optimal tuning much. Thus, it is canon. "Porcupine has no other reasonable mapping of 11" is true but is besides the point cuz not everyone has to be interested in the 11-limit. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 09:01, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

			:::: My point is why consider 2.3.5.7.11 porcupine a different temperament than 2.3.5.7 porcupine? -- 19:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)