User:Lucius Chiaraviglio: Difference between revisions
→Musical Mad Science: Set up for new Keyboard Layouts page |
Undo revision 188610 by Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk) Major editfail -- let's try that again Tag: Undo |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Musical Mad Science == | == Musical Mad Science == | ||
The following | The following page (currently just one of them) is for [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio/Musical Mad Science|Musical Mad Science]] ramblings. | ||
[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio/ | |||
Revision as of 06:32, 28 March 2025
Introduction
Although I have yet to compose anything, I have on occasion thought that "notes between the notes" (to borrow a term from _Hear Between the Lines_) would be fitting in certain circumstances. Several months ago, I stumbled upon the great radiation of microtonal music that is occurring on YouTube thanks to the advent of (semi-)affordable microtonal keyboards and software synthesizers that actually sound good. Surprisingly, the recent microtonal profusion seems to have a great overlap with a profusion of new classical music. In addition, I have found interest in old music that would now be thought of as xenharmonic, such as early Baroque works in quarter-comma meantone. And even if I never compose any microtonal music myself, this experience, including readings on this Xenharmonic Wiki, have been a wild ride in learning what it is that makes today's dominant system of 12 equally spaced notes per octave actually work well.
Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Musical Mad Science
The following page (currently just one of them) is for Musical Mad Science ramblings.