User:Tremend/WIP: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<blockquote>That's a very fair critique, "articulation" is kinda misleading so I'll replace "articulation" with something less ambiguous. | <blockquote>That's a very fair critique, "articulation" is kinda misleading so I'll replace "articulation" with something less ambiguous. | ||
I am really grateful for the fact you're being constructive, unlike most of the server. I appreciate that. Since I was aiming to capture subtle changes in pitch I that might be perceived differently in other tuning contexts. I'll just call it | I am really grateful for the fact you're being constructive, unlike most of the server. I appreciate that. Since I was aiming to capture subtle changes in pitch I that might be perceived differently in other tuning contexts. I'll just call it: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote><blockquote>1: Axis Pivoting (previously Flibberous Harmonics):</blockquote>Refers to deliberate harmonic shifts between different tonal axes, such as moving from a 7-limit position along a septimal kleisma to a complex 5-limit variant. Unlike micro-inflection, which suggests a subtle tonal adjustment within a single harmonic framework, axis pivoting reorients the tonal center by moving across different points within the lattice.<blockquote>2: TRGs</blockquote>A smooth, seamless progression between adjacent intervals within a tuning system. Imagine moving from one note to another in a just intonation (JI) lattice, where the ear perceives a gradual “flow” rather than a sharp jump. TRG’s function could be illustrated using a 7-limit tuning where adjacent intervals (like a 5/4 and 6/5) connect smoothly, different from tonality flux (Partch’s term) in that TRG can apply across single or multiple intervals in a chain, while tonality flux specifically addresses voice leading and micro-adjustments within narrow harmonic confines. | ||