User:CompactStar/EDO impressions: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Disclaimer: Don't expect my opinions to be very informed, I am not a microtonal composer. 1edo: Don't really have much to say for this one. 2edo: TBA 3edo: TBA..."
 
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
[[4edo]]: TBA
[[4edo]]: TBA


[[5edo]]: Very constrained, of course, but it can at least sound consonant, something very lacking in 2edo-4edo. Almost all combinations of notes sound satisfactory so it is ideal for directionless music. The inframinor third is the only type of "third", so it is lacking in any sort of major tonality. Also the smallest EDO in which using a subset can be practical (only really the 1L 3s).
[[5edo]]: Very constrained, of course, but it can at least sound consonant, something very lacking in 2edo-4edo. Almost all combinations of notes sound satisfactory so it is ideal for "randomly-generated" music. The inframinor third is the only type of "third", so it is lacking in any sort of major tonality. Also the smallest EDO in which using a subset can be practical (only really the 1L 3s).

Revision as of 04:01, 17 May 2024

Disclaimer: Don't expect my opinions to be very informed, I am not a microtonal composer.

1edo: Don't really have much to say for this one.

2edo: TBA

3edo: TBA

4edo: TBA

5edo: Very constrained, of course, but it can at least sound consonant, something very lacking in 2edo-4edo. Almost all combinations of notes sound satisfactory so it is ideal for "randomly-generated" music. The inframinor third is the only type of "third", so it is lacking in any sort of major tonality. Also the smallest EDO in which using a subset can be practical (only really the 1L 3s).