∞edo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Added novelty tag, corrected grammar, added “…probably.” to the end |
m Categorised |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
∞edo would be a tuning with an infinite number of notes. However, it would be impossible to use since intervals are spaced like the real numbers. This means ∞edo recreates all harmonics PERFECTLY. Even the smallest of intervals are recreateable. But, you can’t use it. Even if you go up 1 googolplex intervals, you would still have the same note. Unfortunately, no songs will ever use this tuning… probably. | ∞edo would be a tuning with an infinite number of notes. However, it would be impossible to use since intervals are spaced like the real numbers. This means ∞edo recreates all harmonics PERFECTLY. Even the smallest of intervals are recreateable. But, you can’t use it. Even if you go up 1 googolplex intervals, you would still have the same note. Unfortunately, no songs will ever use this tuning… probably. | ||
[[Category:Equal divisions of the octave]] | |||
Revision as of 23:47, 31 January 2024
|
This page presents a novelty topic.
It may contain ideas which are less likely to find practical applications in music, or numbers or structures that are arbitrary or exceedingly small, large, or complex. Novelty topics are often developed by a single person or a small group. As such, this page may also contain idiosyncratic terms, notation, or conceptual frameworks. |
∞edo would be a tuning with an infinite number of notes. However, it would be impossible to use since intervals are spaced like the real numbers. This means ∞edo recreates all harmonics PERFECTLY. Even the smallest of intervals are recreateable. But, you can’t use it. Even if you go up 1 googolplex intervals, you would still have the same note. Unfortunately, no songs will ever use this tuning… probably.