Skip fretting system 53 3 17: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Jeff Brown (talk | contribs)
elaborate on the silver lining
Jeff Brown (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This layout allows someone to play in 53-edo on a 17.666-edo guitar, by tuning the guitar in major thirds -- that is, with 17\53 between each pair of adjacent strings. It offers a big range -- very slightly wider than the [[Kite Guitar]]'s -- and a playable layout, with strikingly easy 5-limit chords.   
This layout allows someone to play in 53-edo on a 17.666-edo guitar, by tuning the guitar in major thirds -- that is, with 17\53 between each pair of adjacent strings. It offers a big range -- very slightly wider than the [[Kite Guitar]]'s -- and a playable layout, with strikingly easy 5-limit chords.   


The diagram below, which could be interpreted 20 frets of a 12-string guitar, shows where each of the 15-limit harmonics lies. Since 53-edo is mostly (see below) for the exception consistent in the 15-limit, these harmonics' positions imply where every interval in that group lies. (For instance, to play 7/6 you move up one string and down one fret, because that takes you from harmonic 3 to harmonic 7.) Octaves are indicated as powers of 2 (specifically 1, 2, 4 and 8).
The diagram below, which could be interpreted 20 frets of a 12-string guitar, shows where each of the 15-limit harmonics lies. Since 53-edo is mostly consistent in the 15-limit (see below for the exception), these harmonics' positions imply where every interval in that group lies. For instance, to play 6:5 requires moving up (toward the treble side) one string and down (toward the nut) one fret.


The exception to the above consistency rule of thumb is the ratios 11/7 (and its octave-complement 14/11). Since 11:8 is 7.9 cents flat and 7:4 is 4.8 cents sharp in 53-edo, the distance between them is 7.9 + 4.8 = 12.7 cents too wide. 12.7 cents is more than half of 53-edo's step size of 22.6 cents. Thus whereas the diagram below suggests that 11:7 is 34 steps wide, in fact 53-edo's best approximation to 11:7 is 35 steps wide. But that best approximation is still 10 cents sharp, so both approximations are roughly equally wrong, just in opposite directions.
The only exception to the above procedure is the ratios 11/7 (and its octave-complement 14/11). Since 11:8 is 7.9 cents flat and 7:4 is 4.8 cents sharp in 53-edo, the distance between them is 7.9 + 4.8 = 12.7 cents too wide. 12.7 cents is more than half of 53-edo's step size of 22.6 cents. Thus whereas the best approximations to 11:8 and 7:4 (and hence the diagram below) suggest that 11:7 is 34 steps wide, in fact 53-edo's best approximation to 11:7 is 35 steps wide. But both approximations are almost equally wrong, just in opposite directions.


     20 frets of a hypothetical 12-string guitar tuned this way:
     20 frets of a hypothetical 12-string guitar tuned this way:

Revision as of 02:26, 24 August 2023

This layout allows someone to play in 53-edo on a 17.666-edo guitar, by tuning the guitar in major thirds -- that is, with 17\53 between each pair of adjacent strings. It offers a big range -- very slightly wider than the Kite Guitar's -- and a playable layout, with strikingly easy 5-limit chords.

The diagram below, which could be interpreted 20 frets of a 12-string guitar, shows where each of the 15-limit harmonics lies. Since 53-edo is mostly consistent in the 15-limit (see below for the exception), these harmonics' positions imply where every interval in that group lies. For instance, to play 6:5 requires moving up (toward the treble side) one string and down (toward the nut) one fret.

The only exception to the above procedure is the ratios 11/7 (and its octave-complement 14/11). Since 11:8 is 7.9 cents flat and 7:4 is 4.8 cents sharp in 53-edo, the distance between them is 7.9 + 4.8 = 12.7 cents too wide. 12.7 cents is more than half of 53-edo's step size of 22.6 cents. Thus whereas the best approximations to 11:8 and 7:4 (and hence the diagram below) suggest that 11:7 is 34 steps wide, in fact 53-edo's best approximation to 11:7 is 35 steps wide. But both approximations are almost equally wrong, just in opposite directions.

   20 frets of a hypothetical 12-string guitar tuned this way:
                       headstock
                       this side
            1  5  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
            -  - 13  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  3
            -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  1  5  -
            9  -  7  - 11  -  -  -  -  -  - 13
            -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
            -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  9  -  7
            -  -  -  -  -  -  -  3 15  -  -  -
   bass     -  -  -  -  -  1  5  -  -  -  -  - treble
   strings 11  -  -  -  -  -  - 13  -  -  -  - strings
   this     -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  - this
   side     -  -  -  -  -  9  -  7  - 11  -  - side
            -  -  -  3 15  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
            -  1  5  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
            -  -  - 13  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
            -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  1  5
            -  9  -  7  - 11  -  -  -  -  -  -
           15  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
            -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  9  -
            -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  3 15  -  -
            -  -  -  -  -  -  1  5  -  -  -  -

The few difficult ratios have easy octave counterparts

One notable drawback to this tuning that, because harmonics 3 and 7 lie on the same string, a harmonic 7:6 is difficult to play. (Doing so requires reaching back 13 frets, or 883 cents, and across three strings.) However, the ratio 7:3 (an octave wider than 7:6) is unusually easy to play, being 3 string crossings and 1 fret wide. Following the same logic, for every difficult interval R less than an octave, it can be shown that R plus an octave is easy to play. There seem to be very few such difficult ratios in the 15-limit. I (Jeff Brown) only see five: 7:6, 13:12, 14:13, 9:8, and 11:9.