8539edo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wikispaces>xenwolf **Imported revision 236820600 - Original comment: ** |
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 511123830 - Original comment: ** |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | ||
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | ||
: This revision was by author [[User: | : This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2014-05-25 17:55:53 UTC</tt>.<br> | ||
: The original revision id was <tt> | : The original revision id was <tt>511123830</tt>.<br> | ||
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | ||
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | ||
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4> | <h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4> | ||
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"> | <div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">The 8539 equal temperament divides the octave into 8539 equal parts of 0.1405 cents each. While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, it's seen actual use as a bookeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the [[tina]] (see http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx.) This is because it is a very strong higher limit system, distinctly consistent through the 27 limit, and is both a [[The Riemann Zeta Function and Tuning#Zeta EDO lists|zeta peak]] and zeta integral tuning. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203</pre></div> | ||
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4> | <h4>Original HTML content:</h4> | ||
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"><html><head><title>8539edo</title></head><body> | <div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"><html><head><title>8539edo</title></head><body>The 8539 equal temperament divides the octave into 8539 equal parts of 0.1405 cents each. While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, it's seen actual use as a bookeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the <a class="wiki_link" href="/tina">tina</a> (see <!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:2:http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx --><a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx</a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:2 -->.) This is because it is a very strong higher limit system, distinctly consistent through the 27 limit, and is both a <a class="wiki_link" href="/The%20Riemann%20Zeta%20Function%20and%20Tuning#Zeta EDO lists">zeta peak</a> and zeta integral tuning. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203</body></html></pre></div> | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 25 May 2014
IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:
- This revision was by author genewardsmith and made on 2014-05-25 17:55:53 UTC.
- The original revision id was 511123830.
- The revision comment was:
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.
Original Wikitext content:
The 8539 equal temperament divides the octave into 8539 equal parts of 0.1405 cents each. While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, it's seen actual use as a bookeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the [[tina]] (see http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx.) This is because it is a very strong higher limit system, distinctly consistent through the 27 limit, and is both a [[The Riemann Zeta Function and Tuning#Zeta EDO lists|zeta peak]] and zeta integral tuning. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203
Original HTML content:
<html><head><title>8539edo</title></head><body>The 8539 equal temperament divides the octave into 8539 equal parts of 0.1405 cents each. While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, it's seen actual use as a bookeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the <a class="wiki_link" href="/tina">tina</a> (see <!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:2:http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx --><a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx</a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:2 -->.) This is because it is a very strong higher limit system, distinctly consistent through the 27 limit, and is both a <a class="wiki_link" href="/The%20Riemann%20Zeta%20Function%20and%20Tuning#Zeta EDO lists">zeta peak</a> and zeta integral tuning. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203</body></html>