User:CompactStar/Ed16/9: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:44, 11 March 2023 view source CompactStar (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,084 edits I meant Neo-Medieval ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:44, 11 March 2023 view source CompactStar (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,084 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''ED16/9''' is the equal division of the the Pythagorean minor seventh ([[16/9]]) into n parts.		'''ED16/9''' is the equal division of the the Pythagorean minor seventh ([[16/9]]) into n parts.

	Division of 16/9 into equal parts can be conceived of as to directly use this interval as an equivalence, or not. The question of [[equivalence]] has not even been posed yet. The utility of 16/9 (or another seventh) as a base though, is apparent by being used at the base of so much modern tonal harmony. ~~Given any odd-numbered [[Ed4/3\|ED4/3]], an~~ ED16/9 can be generated by taking every other tone of ~~the~~ ED4/3, so ED16/9 can also be used for Neo-Medieval harmony and such.		Division of 16/9 into equal parts can be conceived of as to directly use this interval as an equivalence, or not. The question of [[equivalence]] has not even been posed yet. The utility of 16/9 (or another seventh) as a base though, is apparent by being used at the base of so much modern tonal harmony. An ED16/9 can be generated by taking every other tone of an [[ED4/3]], so even-numbered ED16/9s can also be used for Neo-Medieval harmony and such.