Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT/Conventions for names, variables, units, and notations: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs)
Changed formatting of most units to match the units analysis article. More work needed.
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs)
Units: Fixed broken WinCompose link
Line 787: Line 787:


We recommend using a narrow no-break space (U+202F) between quantities and their units.<ref>Per https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html and https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54885/should-there-be-a-space-between-a-value-and-the-units-used
We recommend using a narrow no-break space (U+202F) between quantities and their units.<ref>Per https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html and https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54885/should-there-be-a-space-between-a-value-and-the-units-used
.</ref> For how to type this, see the [[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT: conventions for names, variables, units, and notations#WinCompose sequences|WinCompose]] section below.
.</ref> For how to type this, see the [[#WinCompose|WinCompose]] section below.


{| class="wikitable center-all mw-collapsible"
{| class="wikitable center-all mw-collapsible"