Template talk:Primes in edo fs: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:11, 19 July 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Differences with Template:Primes in edo: re ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 16:18, 19 July 2021 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,129 edits No edit summary
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: The postfix <code>_fs</code> stands for ''fifthspan''. My goal is to add fifthspans to the first template (maybe as an option, maybe automatically added when it's unique). There are also a few things to adjust in formatting, so the hyphen in negative values will be replaced by the minus sign. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 06:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)		: The postfix <code>_fs</code> stands for ''fifthspan''. My goal is to add fifthspans to the first template (maybe as an option, maybe automatically added when it's unique). There are also a few things to adjust in formatting, so the hyphen in negative values will be replaced by the minus sign. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 06:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

			:: That's what I guessed for <code>_fs</code>. Automatic fifthspan for single-ring edos would be fantastic, but no pressure! In the meanwhile, I'll use the regular template when needed, but I won't replace the tables that include the fifthspans for now. [[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 16:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)