FloraC
Joined 30 March 2020
| Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
:: See [[User:Xenwolf/Fifthspan #EDO information with fifthspans]] for examples. This way we include the patent val in one row and the octave reduced steps in the other. I find the values in parentheses confusing, also because of the vagueness of the caption. If we add fifth spans, it's a lot of numbers that can easily be mixed up. So I decided to use thicker borders in some places. Please have a look as to see if the version without parentheses is really that bad... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC) | :: See [[User:Xenwolf/Fifthspan #EDO information with fifthspans]] for examples. This way we include the patent val in one row and the octave reduced steps in the other. I find the values in parentheses confusing, also because of the vagueness of the caption. If we add fifth spans, it's a lot of numbers that can easily be mixed up. So I decided to use thicker borders in some places. Please have a look as to see if the version without parentheses is really that bad... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: It's not ''really that bad''. It's acceptible. Yet an immediate suggestion is getting rid of that ''v'' and really saying "octave reduced" instead of mod ''n''. | |||
::: My preferred form is shown in my sandbox page now. | |||
::: But wait, maybe patent val and fifthspan could be placed in the infobox on the top-right? Since I just realized it ''is'' the patent val, which is simply a line of numbers, where each number need not be separated into cells like that. Placing it in the infobox saves a lot of space and flows better. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC) | |||