User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 170:

I'm planning to add [[fifthspan]] information as well, but this will (probably) not be enabled by default. I also wish to make two rows out of the current last one to get rid of the parentheses. What do you think? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

# That was impressive! I just wonder where the 1.9 comes from. Are you targeting 53edo specifically?

# Sure, this table doesn't scale well into edos as high as 103169. Switching to scientific notation would somewhat improve the readability, but such edos aren't of much use anyway. I wouldn't say it's an emergent problem.

# I don't like separating two rows for the steps. "Reduced" stuff has always been in parentheses and it's fine. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 170: / Line 170: @@
 I'm planning to add [[fifthspan]] information as well, but this will (probably) not be enabled by default. I also wish to make two rows out of the current last one to get rid of the parentheses. What do you think? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
+# That was impressive! I just wonder where the 1.9 comes from. Are you targeting 53edo specifically?
+# Sure, this table doesn't scale well into edos as high as 103169. Switching to scientific notation would somewhat improve the readability, but such edos aren't of much use anyway. I wouldn't say it's an emergent problem.
+# I don't like separating two rows for the steps. "Reduced" stuff has always been in parentheses and it's fine. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)