Talk:TAMNAMS: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:09, 12 June 2021 view source SupahstarSaga (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 130 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:00, 12 June 2021 view source Ayceman (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 173 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::Additionally, the "ave" or "tave" suffix has been redefined in the community to refer to a JI equave, most commonly with "tritave". Because of that, using "decave" to refer to 2/1 in a non-tone mos would be confusing. --[[User:SupahstarSaga\|SupahstarSaga]] ([[User talk:SupahstarSaga\|talk]])		:::Additionally, the "ave" or "tave" suffix has been redefined in the community to refer to a JI equave, most commonly with "tritave". Because of that, using "decave" to refer to 2/1 in a non-tone mos would be confusing. --[[User:SupahstarSaga\|SupahstarSaga]] ([[User talk:SupahstarSaga\|talk]])

			::::I have actually used nonave, decave, and dodecave, but it might be because in my native language the equivalence is immediately obvious. Of course, only for edos, as everything else just has a descriptive universal term (tritave/tertratave/sesquitave/etc). Ditave could be used to provide neutrality, so it might be worth mentioning it as a possibility. [[User:Ayceman\|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman\|talk]]) 20:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)