Template talk:Infobox ET: Difference between revisions
→Consistency level: new section |
|||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
:Yes, especially as they don't make sense for nondiatonic edos such as 13 or 16. Maybe specify the other parameters for diatonic edos but not for nondiatonic edos. Yes, they could be computed. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 22:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | :Yes, especially as they don't make sense for nondiatonic edos such as 13 or 16. Maybe specify the other parameters for diatonic edos but not for nondiatonic edos. Yes, they could be computed. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 22:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Consistency level == | |||
I'd like this to be present in the infobox because it quickly captures how the edo is likely to be used (in an RTT way or in an JI agnostic way). It's present in the theory section of basically every edo, often for the purpose I just mentioned. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC) | |||