22edo: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>Andrew_Heathwaite
**Imported revision 139763515 - Original comment: **
Wikispaces>genewardsmith
**Imported revision 140529147 - Original comment: **
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:Andrew_Heathwaite|Andrew_Heathwaite]] and made on <tt>2010-05-05 16:34:26 UTC</tt>.<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2010-05-09 06:40:24 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>139763515</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>140529147</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
Line 16: Line 16:
The idea of dividing the octave into 22 steps of equal size seems to have originated with nineteenth century music theorist RHM Bosanquet. Inspired by the division of the octave into 22 unequal parts in the [[Indian|music theory of India]], Bosenquet noted that such an equal division was capable of representing 5-limit music with tolerable accuracy. In this he was followed in the twentieth century by theorist José Würschmidt, who noted it as a possible next step after [[19edo|19 equal temperament]], and J. Murray Barbour in his classic survey of tuning history, ''Tuning and Temperament''.
The idea of dividing the octave into 22 steps of equal size seems to have originated with nineteenth century music theorist RHM Bosanquet. Inspired by the division of the octave into 22 unequal parts in the [[Indian|music theory of India]], Bosenquet noted that such an equal division was capable of representing 5-limit music with tolerable accuracy. In this he was followed in the twentieth century by theorist José Würschmidt, who noted it as a possible next step after [[19edo|19 equal temperament]], and J. Murray Barbour in his classic survey of tuning history, ''Tuning and Temperament''.


The 22-et system is in fact the third equal division, after 12 and 19, which is capable of tolerably dealing with 5-limit music. However, there is more to it than that; unlike 12 or 19 it is able to do rough justice to the 7- and 11-limits. While [[31edo|31 equal temperament]] does much better, 22-et at least allows the use of these higher-limit harmonies. Moreover, 22-et, unlike 12 and [[19edo|19]], is not a [[Regular Temperaments#meantone|meantone]] system. The net effect is that 22 allows, and to some extent even forces, the exploration of less familiar musical territory, yet is small enough that it can be used in live performances with suitably designed instruments, such as 22-tone guitars and the like.
The 22-et system is in fact the third equal division, after 12 and 19, which is capable of tolerably dealing with [[Harmonic Limit|5-limit]]  music. However, there is more to it than that; unlike 12 or 19 it is able to do rough justice to the 7- and 11-limits. While [[31edo|31 equal temperament]] does much better, 22-et at least allows the use of these higher-limit harmonies. Moreover, 22-et, unlike 12 and [[19edo|19]], is not a [[Regular Temperaments#meantone|meantone]] system. The net effect is that 22 allows, and to some extent even forces, the exploration of less familiar musical territory, yet is small enough that it can be used in live performances with suitably designed instruments, such as 22-tone guitars and the like.


See also: [[22edo Solfege]], [[22edo Tetrachords]], [[22edo Modes]]
See also: [[22edo Solfege]], [[22edo Tetrachords]], [[22edo Modes]]
Line 28: Line 28:
===A Superpythagorean System===  
===A Superpythagorean System===  


The 22edo fifth, measuring approximately 709.1 cents, is wider than the 702-cent 3-limit fifth, thus making 22edo a "super-pythagorean" system. As with any superpyth, a chain of fifths produces relatively wide major thirds and narrow minor thirds. In the case of 22edo, the thirds are stretched out to the 7-limit; the subminor third comes close to 7/6 and the supermajor third to 9/7. Thus, the resulting diatonic scale, which no longer approximates 5-limit thirds, sounds oddly consonant. The ratio of major 2nd to minor 2nd in this diatonic scale is stretched out to 4:1, with the M2 falling between 9/8 and 8/7, and the m2 falling close to a quarter-tone.
The 22edo fifth, measuring approximately 709.1 cents, is wider than the 702-cent 3-limit fifth, thus making 22edo a "super-pythagorean" system. As with any superpyth, a chain of fifths produces relatively wide major thirds and narrow minor thirds. In the case of 22edo, the thirds are stretched out to the [[Harmonic Limit|7-limit]] ; the subminor third comes close to 7/6 and the supermajor third to 9/7. Thus, the resulting diatonic scale, which no longer approximates 5-limit thirds, sounds oddly consonant. The ratio of major 2nd to minor 2nd in this diatonic scale is stretched out to 4:1, with the M2 falling between 9/8 and 8/7, and the m2 falling close to a quarter-tone.


===11edo===  
===11edo===  
Line 70: Line 70:
The idea of dividing the octave into 22 steps of equal size seems to have originated with nineteenth century music theorist RHM Bosanquet. Inspired by the division of the octave into 22 unequal parts in the &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Indian"&gt;music theory of India&lt;/a&gt;, Bosenquet noted that such an equal division was capable of representing 5-limit music with tolerable accuracy. In this he was followed in the twentieth century by theorist José Würschmidt, who noted it as a possible next step after &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/19edo"&gt;19 equal temperament&lt;/a&gt;, and J. Murray Barbour in his classic survey of tuning history, ''Tuning and Temperament''.&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of dividing the octave into 22 steps of equal size seems to have originated with nineteenth century music theorist RHM Bosanquet. Inspired by the division of the octave into 22 unequal parts in the &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Indian"&gt;music theory of India&lt;/a&gt;, Bosenquet noted that such an equal division was capable of representing 5-limit music with tolerable accuracy. In this he was followed in the twentieth century by theorist José Würschmidt, who noted it as a possible next step after &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/19edo"&gt;19 equal temperament&lt;/a&gt;, and J. Murray Barbour in his classic survey of tuning history, ''Tuning and Temperament''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 22-et system is in fact the third equal division, after 12 and 19, which is capable of tolerably dealing with 5-limit music. However, there is more to it than that; unlike 12 or 19 it is able to do rough justice to the 7- and 11-limits. While &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/31edo"&gt;31 equal temperament&lt;/a&gt; does much better, 22-et at least allows the use of these higher-limit harmonies. Moreover, 22-et, unlike 12 and &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/19edo"&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;, is not a &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Regular%20Temperaments#meantone"&gt;meantone&lt;/a&gt; system. The net effect is that 22 allows, and to some extent even forces, the exploration of less familiar musical territory, yet is small enough that it can be used in live performances with suitably designed instruments, such as 22-tone guitars and the like.&lt;br /&gt;
The 22-et system is in fact the third equal division, after 12 and 19, which is capable of tolerably dealing with &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Harmonic%20Limit"&gt;5-limit&lt;/a&gt;  music. However, there is more to it than that; unlike 12 or 19 it is able to do rough justice to the 7- and 11-limits. While &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/31edo"&gt;31 equal temperament&lt;/a&gt; does much better, 22-et at least allows the use of these higher-limit harmonies. Moreover, 22-et, unlike 12 and &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/19edo"&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;, is not a &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Regular%20Temperaments#meantone"&gt;meantone&lt;/a&gt; system. The net effect is that 22 allows, and to some extent even forces, the exploration of less familiar musical territory, yet is small enough that it can be used in live performances with suitably designed instruments, such as 22-tone guitars and the like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/22edo%20Solfege"&gt;22edo Solfege&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/22edo%20Tetrachords"&gt;22edo Tetrachords&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/22edo%20Modes"&gt;22edo Modes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
See also: &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/22edo%20Solfege"&gt;22edo Solfege&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/22edo%20Tetrachords"&gt;22edo Tetrachords&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/22edo%20Modes"&gt;22edo Modes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Line 82: Line 82:
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:4:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc2"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory-Properties of 22 equal temperament-A Superpythagorean System"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:4 --&gt;A Superpythagorean System&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:4:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc2"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory-Properties of 22 equal temperament-A Superpythagorean System"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:4 --&gt;A Superpythagorean System&lt;/h3&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The 22edo fifth, measuring approximately 709.1 cents, is wider than the 702-cent 3-limit fifth, thus making 22edo a &amp;quot;super-pythagorean&amp;quot; system. As with any superpyth, a chain of fifths produces relatively wide major thirds and narrow minor thirds. In the case of 22edo, the thirds are stretched out to the 7-limit; the subminor third comes close to 7/6 and the supermajor third to 9/7. Thus, the resulting diatonic scale, which no longer approximates 5-limit thirds, sounds oddly consonant. The ratio of major 2nd to minor 2nd in this diatonic scale is stretched out to 4:1, with the M2 falling between 9/8 and 8/7, and the m2 falling close to a quarter-tone.&lt;br /&gt;
The 22edo fifth, measuring approximately 709.1 cents, is wider than the 702-cent 3-limit fifth, thus making 22edo a &amp;quot;super-pythagorean&amp;quot; system. As with any superpyth, a chain of fifths produces relatively wide major thirds and narrow minor thirds. In the case of 22edo, the thirds are stretched out to the &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Harmonic%20Limit"&gt;7-limit&lt;/a&gt; ; the subminor third comes close to 7/6 and the supermajor third to 9/7. Thus, the resulting diatonic scale, which no longer approximates 5-limit thirds, sounds oddly consonant. The ratio of major 2nd to minor 2nd in this diatonic scale is stretched out to 4:1, with the M2 falling between 9/8 and 8/7, and the m2 falling close to a quarter-tone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:6:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc3"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory-Properties of 22 equal temperament-11edo"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:6 --&gt;11edo&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:6:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc3"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory-Properties of 22 equal temperament-11edo"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:6 --&gt;11edo&lt;/h3&gt;
Line 91: Line 91:
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Erlich, Paul, ''Tuning, Tonality, and Twenty-Two Tone Temperament''&lt;br /&gt;
Erlich, Paul, ''Tuning, Tonality, and Twenty-Two Tone Temperament''&lt;br /&gt;
*[&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:89:http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/text/tuning22.pdf --&gt;&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/text/tuning22.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/text/tuning22.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:89 --&gt;] or &lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:90:http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf --&gt;&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:90 --&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:91:http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/text/tuning22.pdf --&gt;&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/text/tuning22.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/text/tuning22.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:91 --&gt;] or &lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:92:http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf --&gt;&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:92 --&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:10:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc5"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory-References"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:10 --&gt;References&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:10:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc5"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory-References"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:10 --&gt;References&lt;/h2&gt;
Line 97: Line 97:
Barbour, James Murray, ''Tuning and temperament, a historical survey'', East Lansing, Michigan State College Press, 1953 [c1951]&lt;br /&gt;
Barbour, James Murray, ''Tuning and temperament, a historical survey'', East Lansing, Michigan State College Press, 1953 [c1951]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bosanquet, R.H.M. [&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:91:http://www.geocities.com/threesixesinarow/hindoo.htm --&gt;&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.geocities.com/threesixesinarow/hindoo.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.geocities.com/threesixesinarow/hindoo.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:91 --&gt; ''On the Hindoo division of the octave, with additions to the theory of higher orders''], Proceedings of the Royal Society of London vol. 26, 1879, pp. 272-284. Reproduced in Tagore, Sourindro Mohun, ''Hindu Music from Various Authors'', Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series, Varanasi, India, 1965&lt;br /&gt;
Bosanquet, R.H.M. [&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:93:http://www.geocities.com/threesixesinarow/hindoo.htm --&gt;&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.geocities.com/threesixesinarow/hindoo.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.geocities.com/threesixesinarow/hindoo.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:93 --&gt; ''On the Hindoo division of the octave, with additions to the theory of higher orders''], Proceedings of the Royal Society of London vol. 26, 1879, pp. 272-284. Reproduced in Tagore, Sourindro Mohun, ''Hindu Music from Various Authors'', Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series, Varanasi, India, 1965&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;