ELD: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
But it is also possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch — divide it into 12 equal parts by '''frequency''', or '''length'''. In the former case, you will have 12-EFDO, and in the latter case, you will have 12-ELDO. However, that's not exactly ideal because, as with arithmetic sequences, different acronyms are used to distinguish rational (JI) tunings from irrational (non-JI) tunings, and so EFD and ELD are typically reserved for irrational tunings, such as 12-EFDφ. So it would be more appropriate to name these two tunings 12-ODO and 12-UDO, for otonal divisions of the octave and utonal divisions of the octave, respectively. | But it is also possible to — instead of equally dividing the octave in 12 equal parts by pitch — divide it into 12 equal parts by '''frequency''', or '''length'''. In the former case, you will have 12-EFDO, and in the latter case, you will have 12-ELDO. However, that's not exactly ideal because, as with arithmetic sequences, different acronyms are used to distinguish rational (JI) tunings from irrational (non-JI) tunings, and so EFD and ELD are typically reserved for irrational tunings, such as 12-EFDφ. So it would be more appropriate to name these two tunings 12-ODO and 12-UDO, for otonal divisions of the octave and utonal divisions of the octave, respectively. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+example: | |||
|- | |||
! quantity | |||
! 1 | |||
! 2 | |||
! 3 | |||
! 4 | |||
! 5 | |||
! 6 | |||
! 7 | |||
! 8 | |||
! 9 | |||
|- | |||
! frequency | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
! pitch | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
! length | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||