Just intonation: Difference between revisions
m →Constrained Just: Described primodality Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Recast lead section, added Wikipedia box, capitalization, misc. edits |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ja = | | ja = | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Wikipedia}} | |||
Just | '''Just intonation''' ('''JI''') is an approach to [[tuning system|musical tuning]] where pitches are chosen in a way such that every [[interval]] can be expressed as a [[Wikipedia: Rational number|rational]] [[ratio]] of the frequencies of pitches<ref>Just intonation is sometimes distinguished from ''rational intonation'', by requiring that the ratios be lower than some arbitrary complexity (as for example measured by [[Tenney height]], [[Benedetti height]], etc.) but there is no clear dividing line. The matter is partially a question of intent. The rank two tuning system in which all intervals are given as combinations of the just perfect fourth, 4/3, and the just minor third, 6/5, would seem to be a nonoctave 5-limit just intonation system by definition. In practice however, it casually suggests a rank two 7-limit [[microtempering]] system because of very accurate approximations to the octave and to seven limit intervals: (6/5)<sup>2</sup>/(4/3) = 27/25, the semitone maximus or just minor second; and (27/25)<sup>9</sup> is less than a cent short of an octave, while (27/25)<sup>2</sup> is almost precisely 7/6, the septimal minor third.</ref>. | ||
== Just intonation explained == | |||
If you are used to speaking only in note names (e.g. the first 7 letters of the alphabet), you may need to study the relation between frequency and [[Wikipedia: Pitch (music)|pitch]]. Kyle Gann's ''[http://www.kylegann.com/tuning.html Just Intonation Explained]'' is one good reference. A transparent illustration and one of just intonation's acoustic bases is the [[OverToneSeries|harmonic series]]. | If you are used to speaking only in note names (e.g. the first 7 letters of the alphabet), you may need to study the relation between frequency and [[Wikipedia: Pitch (music)|pitch]]. Kyle Gann's ''[http://www.kylegann.com/tuning.html Just Intonation Explained]'' is one good reference. A transparent illustration and one of just intonation's acoustic bases is the [[OverToneSeries|harmonic series]]. | ||
In languages other than English, the original conceptions of " | In languages other than English, the original conceptions of "just intonation" are more obviously retained in the terms used in those languages: German ''Reine Stimmung'' (pure, that is, beatless, tuning), Ukrainian ''Натуральний стрій'' and French ''gamme naturelle'' (both referring to the "natural scale", that is, intervals derived from the harmonic series), Italian ''intonazione naturale'' (natural intonation, once again intervals derived from harmonic series), and so on. | ||
In the English language, the term "just" once referred to "true, correct", and is still used today in this sense, in the crafts. In printing, to "justify" a line of type is to fit it precisely to a certain measure, for example. The original sense, then, was similar to that sense which is clearly retained in other languages as "natural". | In the English language, the term "just" once referred to "true, correct", and is still used today in this sense, in the crafts. In printing, to "justify" a line of type is to fit it precisely to a certain measure, for example. The original sense, then, was similar to that sense which is clearly retained in other languages as "natural". | ||
Of course, a historical description of something as "natural" does not prove that something is "natural." Similarly labeling something "natural" without any ground, especially in the arts, is always very problematic. Nevertheless, the historical meanings of the terms for what we call " | Of course, a historical description of something as "natural" does not prove that something is "natural." Similarly labeling something "natural" without any ground, especially in the arts, is always very problematic. Nevertheless, the historical meanings of the terms for what we call "just intonation" do claim a "natural" status, and just intonation is indeed derived from genuine acoustic phenomena. How important, universal, etc., these phenomena are has been a matter of debate for thousands of years. | ||
Specifying ratios of frequencies is another way of expressing the "natural scale", for it describes ratios between partials in the harmonic series (in their ideal form). So, contemporary usage of the term is in keeping with historical and international usages. However, just as harmonic vocabulary has expanded over the centuries, so has that which falls under "just intonation" expanded. | Specifying ratios of frequencies is another way of expressing the "natural scale", for it describes ratios between partials in the harmonic series (in their ideal form). So, contemporary usage of the term is in keeping with historical and international usages. However, just as harmonic vocabulary has expanded over the centuries, so has that which falls under "just intonation" expanded. | ||
Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
Of course we are describing an ideal tone - in real life, tones waver, certain harmonics are missing, etc. Nevertheless this is the harmonic series, and measuring the spectra of violins (or any other stringed instruments), human voices, and woodwinds, for example, will reveal that this is indeed the pattern, and even in our "fuzzy" and "flawed" reality, spectra adhere to this pattern with impressive consistency. | Of course we are describing an ideal tone - in real life, tones waver, certain harmonics are missing, etc. Nevertheless this is the harmonic series, and measuring the spectra of violins (or any other stringed instruments), human voices, and woodwinds, for example, will reveal that this is indeed the pattern, and even in our "fuzzy" and "flawed" reality, spectra adhere to this pattern with impressive consistency. | ||
In a tuning "according to the natural scale", we have for example a "perfect fifth" as simply the ratio between the third partial and the second partial: "3:2". In our example tone, that would be the ratio of 300 Hz to 200 Hz. Where we to want a | In a tuning "according to the natural scale", we have for example a "perfect fifth" as simply the ratio between the third partial and the second partial: "3:2". In our example tone, that would be the ratio of 300 Hz to 200 Hz. Where we to want a just intonation perfect fifth above our original tone, its fundamental frequency would be found at 3/2 times the fundamental frequency of our original tone. So, 3/2 times 100 gives us 150. Our example perfect fifth has a fundamental frequency at 150 Hz. | ||
Now, let us play our two example tones together, and we shall see why the German term is ''Reine'', "pure", and why you'll hear "pure" used in English and many other languages as well. Let's call our first tone "Do" and our second tone, a perfect fifth higher, "Sol". | Now, let us play our two example tones together, and we shall see why the German term is ''Reine'', "pure", and why you'll hear "pure" used in English and many other languages as well. Let's call our first tone "Do" and our second tone, a perfect fifth higher, "Sol". | ||
Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
One does not need to know of the harmonic series, nor even know how to read, or even count, to sing this. | One does not need to know of the harmonic series, nor even know how to read, or even count, to sing this. | ||
There is more to it than this, of course, but the basic principles of | There is more to it than this, of course, but the basic principles of just intonation are very simple. Hundreds of years ago, when the intonation of a few well-known intervals was the concern, understanding and defining "just" was not difficult. These days, though, and going on from these basics, it can get a bit more complicated... | ||
== Just | == Just intonation in use == | ||
To start off your exploration of just intonation scales, the [[Gallery of 12-tone Just Intonation Scales]] is a good place to start. | To start off your exploration of just intonation scales, the [[Gallery of 12-tone Just Intonation Scales]] is a good place to start. | ||
Look at [[Notation|notation systems]] for | Look at [[Notation|notation systems]] for just intonation. | ||
The use of just intonation could be divided into these two flavors: | The use of just intonation could be divided into these two flavors: | ||
=== Free | === Free style just === | ||
[[Lou Harrison]] used this term; it means that you choose just-intonation pitches from the set of all possible just intervals (not from a mode or scale) as you use them in music. Dedicated page: [[FreeStyleJI|FreeStyleJI]] | [[Lou Harrison]] used this term; it means that you choose just-intonation pitches from the set of all possible just intervals (not from a mode or scale) as you use them in music. Dedicated page: [[FreeStyleJI|FreeStyleJI]] | ||
=== Constrained | === Constrained just === | ||
(In need of a better name maybe) Here are six ways that musicians and theorists have constrained the field of potential just ratios (from Jacques Dudon, "Differential Coherence", ''1/1'' vol. 11, no. 2: p.1): | (In need of a better name maybe) Here are six ways that musicians and theorists have constrained the field of potential just ratios (from Jacques Dudon, "Differential Coherence", ''1/1'' vol. 11, no. 2: p.1): | ||
Line 58: | Line 59: | ||
# ''Restrictions on the combinations of numbers that make up the numerator and denominator of the ratios under consideration, such as the "monophonic" system of [[Wikipedia: Harry Partch|Harry Partch]]'s [[Wikipedia: Tonality diamond|tonality diamond]]. This, incidentally, is an eleven-limit system that only makes use of ratios of the form n:d, where n and d are drawn only from harmonics 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, or their octaves.'' | # ''Restrictions on the combinations of numbers that make up the numerator and denominator of the ratios under consideration, such as the "monophonic" system of [[Wikipedia: Harry Partch|Harry Partch]]'s [[Wikipedia: Tonality diamond|tonality diamond]]. This, incidentally, is an eleven-limit system that only makes use of ratios of the form n:d, where n and d are drawn only from harmonics 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, or their octaves.'' | ||
# ''Other theorists who, in contrast to the above, advocate the use of [[Wikipedia: Hexany|products sets]] of given arrays of prime numbers, such as [[Wikipedia: Erv Wilson|Ervin Wilson]], Robert Dussaut, and others.'' | # ''Other theorists who, in contrast to the above, advocate the use of [[Wikipedia: Hexany|products sets]] of given arrays of prime numbers, such as [[Wikipedia: Erv Wilson|Ervin Wilson]], Robert Dussaut, and others.'' | ||
# ''[[Just intonation subgroups|Restrictions on the variety of prime numbers]] used within a system, for example, 3 used with only one [sic, also included is 2] other prime 7, 11, or 13.... This is quite common practice with Ptolemy, Ibn-Sina, Al-Farabi, and Saf-al-Din, and with numerous contemporary composers working in | # ''[[Just intonation subgroups|Restrictions on the variety of prime numbers]] used within a system, for example, 3 used with only one [sic, also included is 2] other prime 7, 11, or 13.... This is quite common practice with Ptolemy, Ibn-Sina, Al-Farabi, and Saf-al-Din, and with numerous contemporary composers working in just intonation.'' | ||
# ''Restricting the denominator to one or very few values (the [[harmonic series]]).'' | # ''Restricting the denominator to one or very few values (the [[harmonic series]]).'' | ||
# ''Restricting the numerator to one or a very few values (the [[subharmonic series]] or [[aliquot scales]]).'' | # ''Restricting the numerator to one or a very few values (the [[subharmonic series]] or [[aliquot scales]]).'' | ||
Line 72: | Line 73: | ||
[[Adaptive just intonation]] | [[Adaptive just intonation]] | ||
== | == See also == | ||
* [[Gallery of just intervals]] | * [[Gallery of just intervals]] | ||
* [[Gallery of 12-tone just intonation scales]] | * [[Gallery of 12-tone just intonation scales]] | ||
Line 84: | Line 85: | ||
* [[boogiewoogiescale|Boogie woogie scale]] | * [[boogiewoogiescale|Boogie woogie scale]] | ||
== | == References == | ||
<references /> | |||
== External links == | |||
* [http://nowitzky.hostwebs.com/justint/ Just Intonation] by Mark Nowitzky [http://www.webcitation.org/5xeAm2lPL Permalink] | * [http://nowitzky.hostwebs.com/justint/ Just Intonation] by Mark Nowitzky [http://www.webcitation.org/5xeAm2lPL Permalink] | ||
* [http://www.kylegann.com/tuning.html Just Intonation Explained] by Kyle Gann [http://www.webcitation.org/5xe2iC7Nq Permalink] | * [http://www.kylegann.com/tuning.html Just Intonation Explained] by Kyle Gann [http://www.webcitation.org/5xe2iC7Nq Permalink] | ||
Line 94: | Line 97: | ||
* [http://lumma.org/tuning/gws/commaseq.htm Comma Sequences] by Gene Ward Smith [http://www.webcitation.org/5xe4rPLZ0 Permalink] | * [http://lumma.org/tuning/gws/commaseq.htm Comma Sequences] by Gene Ward Smith [http://www.webcitation.org/5xe4rPLZ0 Permalink] | ||
* [https://casfaculty.case.edu/ross-duffin/just-intonation-in-renaissance-theory-practice/ Just Intonation in Renaissance Theory & Practice] by Ross W. Duffin | * [https://casfaculty.case.edu/ross-duffin/just-intonation-in-renaissance-theory-practice/ Just Intonation in Renaissance Theory & Practice] by Ross W. Duffin | ||
[[Category:Just intonation| ]] <!-- main article --> | [[Category:Just intonation| ]] <!-- main article --> | ||
[[Category:Overview]] | [[Category:Overview]] | ||
[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] |