Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Reverting factually wrong additions: re to Aura's complete circle... |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
::: I must point out that the degree of n-consistency that I look for on "an interval set S" in the 3-limit has everything to do with whether or not you can go around a complete circle of fifths in a given EDO without accumulating a relative error of 50% or more. That's the specific type of n-consistency that I think I can regard as "complete". --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ::: I must point out that the degree of n-consistency that I look for on "an interval set S" in the 3-limit has everything to do with whether or not you can go around a complete circle of fifths in a given EDO without accumulating a relative error of 50% or more. That's the specific type of n-consistency that I think I can regard as "complete". --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::: This kind of consistency ("complete circle of fifths") seems problematic to me: How will you generalize these rings to other prime intervals? Also, aren't you interested in combinations of multiple prime dimensions (besides 2, of course)? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | |||