Talk:318edo: Difference between revisions
Name (ratio) vs ratio (name) |
→Readability: re |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::: Unfortunately, I didn't have as many resources for figuring out what commas this EDO tempered out. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ::: Unfortunately, I didn't have as many resources for figuring out what commas this EDO tempered out. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::: I fear you completely misunderstand my point. I'm guessing you weren't too enthusiastic about text problems in math class either? So why do you choose the text form to represent commas (these are in the end also a collection of mathematical facts)? Maybe a list or table would do a better job here. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Name (ratio) vs ratio (name) == | == Name (ratio) vs ratio (name) == | ||
Which is the better format for showing the commas in the circumstance of a large edo? Ratio (name) seems better to me because large edos tend to temper out some unnamed commas that are among the simplest for that edo. We can turn to monzo when the ratio gets complex enough. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | Which is the better format for showing the commas in the circumstance of a large edo? Ratio (name) seems better to me because large edos tend to temper out some unnamed commas that are among the simplest for that edo. We can turn to monzo when the ratio gets complex enough. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ||