Talk:318edo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:46, 7 January 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,889 edits →Readability: a worrying fact ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:08, 7 January 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Readability: re Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: I'm afraid a lot of other mega-edo pages are written this way, too. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 09:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)		: I'm afraid a lot of other mega-edo pages are written this way, too. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 09:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

			:: Yes, a lot of work on old pages, but we should especially have an eye on newly created pages. Of course, when we now edit old pages (especially for minor fixes) we have to be careful what we leave behind. People tend to get used to things that they see as accepted by others, especially by experienced users. Take [[206edo]] for an example, it's better now but still not good, we should a it in some [[:Category:Todo\|todo category]], but I don't find the right one (rework seems to much, review to little). To get back to this article, I think that enumerations of technical facts should be made obvious as such. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)