|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == Jamesbond, Catler, etc. ==
| |
| Are temperaments such as Jamesbond and Catler going to be omitted from this tree because they become rank-1 when restricted to the 5 limit?
| |
| | |
| They're perfectly good rank-2 temperaments in the 7 limit.
| |
| | |
| - '''keenanpepper''' December 01, 2011, 01:58:41 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| You can see what I did with omicronbeta. Do you think that is a good approach?
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' December 01, 2011, 07:34:00 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| Maybe a better on would be to have a top level of 7edo, 12edo, 31edo, 72edo etc temperaments when the badness figures are low enough to warrent it.
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' December 01, 2011, 07:45:05 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == What is this? ==
| |
| What makes this a tree? What are the numbers; some kind of badness?
| |
| | |
| - '''keenanpepper''' November 28, 2011, 02:46:34 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| it's also an orphaned page :-(
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' November 28, 2011, 03:06:56 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| It's a work in progress. The numbers are logflat badness, and what makes it a tree is hypertext.
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' November 28, 2011, 09:50:49 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| I meant what logically makes it a tree, rather than, say, a directed acyclic graph.
| |
| | |
| - '''keenanpepper''' November 28, 2011, 11:00:42 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| See if the explanation I've put at the top helps.
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' November 28, 2011, 10:04:49 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| Would it be perhaps helpful if I coded up a nice JS interface for this, allowing you to show and hide branches from the tree? That way we'd only have one page instead of a hundred.
| |
| | |
| - '''mbattaglia1''' November 29, 2011, 11:02:50 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| That sounds like a fine idea, but would it be editable?
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' November 29, 2011, 11:25:45 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| Sure, but I'm still trying to figure out exactly what you have in mind with this; it's quite mysterious for now. This is basically a list of 5-limit temperaments, and then you click on one and it shows you all the children, right?
| |
| | |
| - '''mbattaglia1''' November 29, 2011, 11:31:15 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |