Complexity spectrum: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikispaces>genewardsmith
**Imported revision 274836228 - Original comment: **
Wikispaces>FREEZE
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
One of the things one can look at when analyzing a temperament is its complexity spectrum. This may be defined as the result of sorting the complexity of the intervals in the q [[Odd_limit|odd limit]] [[Tonality_diamond|tonality diamond]] between the unison and half an octave, where q is two less than the next prime after the prime limit of the temperament in question. In the rank two case, the complexity is [[Graham_complexity|Graham complexity]], but for higher limits we can use [[Tenney-Euclidean_metrics|OE complexity]], which is proportional to Graham complexity in the rank two case, but is also valid for higher limits.
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2011-11-13 13:02:18 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>274836228</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">One of the things one can look at when analyzing a temperament is its complexity spectrum. This may be defined as the result of sorting the complexity of the intervals in the q [[odd limit]] [[tonality diamond]] between the unison and half an octave, where q is two less than the next prime after the prime limit of the temperament in question. In the rank two case, the complexity is [[Graham complexity]], but for higher limits we can use [[Tenney-Euclidean metrics|OE complexity]], which is proportional to Graham complexity in the rank two case, but is also valid for higher limits.


The different flavors of a temperament, so to speak, are shown in its spectrum. A temperament like meantone, which favors 3 over 5, and 5 over 7, has quite a different flavor than miracle, which favors 7, 11/9 and 7/5.
The different flavors of a temperament, so to speak, are shown in its spectrum. A temperament like meantone, which favors 3 over 5, and 5 over 7, has quite a different flavor than miracle, which favors 7, 11/9 and 7/5.
Line 16: Line 9:
You can see it favors 5 over 7 and 7 over 11; for how much I could stick in the actual numerical complexities, but you can see that 9/8 and 10/9 are more complex than some 7 and 11 limit intervals just from the above.
You can see it favors 5 over 7 and 7 over 11; for how much I could stick in the actual numerical complexities, but you can see that 9/8 and 10/9 are more complex than some 7 and 11 limit intervals just from the above.


Here's the spectrum for 13-limit [[Werckismic temperaments|history]], the temperament tempering out 364/363, 441/440 and 1001/1000 which is part of [[the Archipelago]]:
Here's the spectrum for 13-limit [[Werckismic_temperaments|history]], the temperament tempering out 364/363, 441/440 and 1001/1000 which is part of [[The_Archipelago|the Archipelago]]:


11/10, 15/13, 14/11, 4/3, 7/5, 5/4, 11/8, 18/13, 15/11, 13/12, 13/10, 6/5, 8/7, 16/15, 12/11, 13/11, 9/8, 16/13, 15/14, 10/9, 7/6, 11/9, 14/13, 9/7
11/10, 15/13, 14/11, 4/3, 7/5, 5/4, 11/8, 18/13, 15/11, 13/12, 13/10, 6/5, 8/7, 16/15, 12/11, 13/11, 9/8, 16/13, 15/14, 10/9, 7/6, 11/9, 14/13, 9/7


Even leaving aside the somewhat greater complexity and accuracy, it just won't taste the same.</pre></div>
Even leaving aside the somewhat greater complexity and accuracy, it just won't taste the same.
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4>
[[Category:theory]]
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;Spectrum of a temperament&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;One of the things one can look at when analyzing a temperament is its complexity spectrum. This may be defined as the result of sorting the complexity of the intervals in the q &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/odd%20limit"&gt;odd limit&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/tonality%20diamond"&gt;tonality diamond&lt;/a&gt; between the unison and half an octave, where q is two less than the next prime after the prime limit of the temperament in question. In the rank two case, the complexity is &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Graham%20complexity"&gt;Graham complexity&lt;/a&gt;, but for higher limits we can use &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Tenney-Euclidean%20metrics"&gt;OE complexity&lt;/a&gt;, which is proportional to Graham complexity in the rank two case, but is also valid for higher limits.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:todo:clear_some_link_texts]]
&lt;br /&gt;
The different flavors of a temperament, so to speak, are shown in its spectrum. A temperament like meantone, which favors 3 over 5, and 5 over 7, has quite a different flavor than miracle, which favors 7, 11/9 and 7/5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's the spectrum for 11-limit marvel:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5/4, 4/3, 7/6, 8/7, 7/5, 6/5, 9/7, 12/11, 9/8, 11/8, 11/9, 10/9, 11/10, 14/11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can see it favors 5 over 7 and 7 over 11; for how much I could stick in the actual numerical complexities, but you can see that 9/8 and 10/9 are more complex than some 7 and 11 limit intervals just from the above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's the spectrum for 13-limit &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Werckismic%20temperaments"&gt;history&lt;/a&gt;, the temperament tempering out 364/363, 441/440 and 1001/1000 which is part of &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/the%20Archipelago"&gt;the Archipelago&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11/10, 15/13, 14/11, 4/3, 7/5, 5/4, 11/8, 18/13, 15/11, 13/12, 13/10, 6/5, 8/7, 16/15, 12/11, 13/11, 9/8, 16/13, 15/14, 10/9, 7/6, 11/9, 14/13, 9/7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even leaving aside the somewhat greater complexity and accuracy, it just won't taste the same.&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>

Revision as of 00:00, 17 July 2018

One of the things one can look at when analyzing a temperament is its complexity spectrum. This may be defined as the result of sorting the complexity of the intervals in the q odd limit tonality diamond between the unison and half an octave, where q is two less than the next prime after the prime limit of the temperament in question. In the rank two case, the complexity is Graham complexity, but for higher limits we can use OE complexity, which is proportional to Graham complexity in the rank two case, but is also valid for higher limits.

The different flavors of a temperament, so to speak, are shown in its spectrum. A temperament like meantone, which favors 3 over 5, and 5 over 7, has quite a different flavor than miracle, which favors 7, 11/9 and 7/5.

Here's the spectrum for 11-limit marvel:

5/4, 4/3, 7/6, 8/7, 7/5, 6/5, 9/7, 12/11, 9/8, 11/8, 11/9, 10/9, 11/10, 14/11

You can see it favors 5 over 7 and 7 over 11; for how much I could stick in the actual numerical complexities, but you can see that 9/8 and 10/9 are more complex than some 7 and 11 limit intervals just from the above.

Here's the spectrum for 13-limit history, the temperament tempering out 364/363, 441/440 and 1001/1000 which is part of the Archipelago:

11/10, 15/13, 14/11, 4/3, 7/5, 5/4, 11/8, 18/13, 15/11, 13/12, 13/10, 6/5, 8/7, 16/15, 12/11, 13/11, 9/8, 16/13, 15/14, 10/9, 7/6, 11/9, 14/13, 9/7

Even leaving aside the somewhat greater complexity and accuracy, it just won't taste the same.