Talk:Sensipent family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m note |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::::::: I didn't came up with all the schemes. Subgroup extensions were originally completely separate from family/clan pages, or if they were in the same page, they were always at the bottom. See ''Meantone family'' as an example (I never moved any subgroup temp to the bottom in that page). I try to strike a balance by prioritizing subgroups that skip one prime, which covers a significant part of practical cases ''and'' makes organizational sense. I believe you should work on the theory of the subgroups themselves if you want more ppl to recognize your work cuz it's baseless to consider the so-called potentially significant unique opportunities otherwise. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:58, 26 August 2026 (UTC) | ::::::: I didn't came up with all the schemes. Subgroup extensions were originally completely separate from family/clan pages, or if they were in the same page, they were always at the bottom. See ''Meantone family'' as an example (I never moved any subgroup temp to the bottom in that page). I try to strike a balance by prioritizing subgroups that skip one prime, which covers a significant part of practical cases ''and'' makes organizational sense. I believe you should work on the theory of the subgroups themselves if you want more ppl to recognize your work cuz it's baseless to consider the so-called potentially significant unique opportunities otherwise. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:58, 26 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::::::: Oh nvm, I noticed there's a short discussion under a bolded '''Subgroup extensions:''' section that mentions the extensions, so I'm satisfied with this compromise, as I was worried that there would be no mention at all of the subgroup extensions relative to the head temp. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 21:00, 26 August 2026 (UTC) | |||