Talk:Sensipent family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
reply |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::: It's esoteric cuz the subgroup is esoteric. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:48, 24 August 2026 (UTC) | ::::: It's esoteric cuz the subgroup is esoteric. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:48, 24 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::::: It seems to me that this sense only serves to prioritise low-prime-limit temps with complete subgroups (''which obviously did not need more prioritisation given that's the standard structure of the wiki''), while shifting focus away from potentially significant unique opportunities (as judged by high accuracy and completion of interpretations) in higher limits. for example, 5-limit diaschismic has an obvious subgroup extension to prime 17 which should be considered canonical. And similarly, [[Diaschismic_family#Srutal_archagall_(2.3.5.17)|moving it to the end]] had the same effect ("shifting focus away from potentially significant unique opportunities (as judged by high accuracy and completion of interpretations)"). --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:11, 25 August 2026 (UTC) | |||