Talk:Sagittal notation: Difference between revisions
m →Hybrid of Revo Sagittal with HEJI, Sagittal Natural?: Fix formatting |
|||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Added: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:21, 21 July 2026 (UTC)<br> | Added: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:21, 21 July 2026 (UTC)<br> | ||
Last modified: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:36, 21 July 2026 (UTC) | Last modified: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:36, 21 July 2026 (UTC) | ||
: Setting aside that wiki talk pages are usually reserved for discussion about the wiki (description of existing work), not the topic itself (I suppose the best place would be the Sagittal forum), I believe that simply using a natural accidental followed by a restatement of whichever accidental needs to be carried over should suffice. That logic could be applied to any combination of two accidental symbol sets, although I know the rules for Kite's ups and downs are slightly different, e.g. an arrow alone implies a natural accidental, cancelling any prior sharp or flat. Furthermore, I think the Sagittal notation system is largely flexible enough to accommodate rank-3 tunings without any other symbols, especially the revo set. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 14:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC) | |||