Talk:5120/5103: Difference between revisions
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
# '''Yes''', I'm only weakly towards that name, but it feels alright, if the community wants it. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | # '''Yes''', I'm only weakly towards that name, but it feels alright, if the community wants it. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
# '''Yes.''' [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 20:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | # '''Yes.''' [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 20:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
# '''Yes'''. "Argentic" should still refer to the 2.3.7/5 subgroup temperament, however, per the change I made. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
: I was under the impression that "argent" won out in the community? – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | : I was under the impression that "argent" won out in the community? – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: In my opinion it's a bit too confusing with the logarithmic argent tuning, even though it is closely related. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | :: In my opinion it's a bit too confusing with the logarithmic argent tuning, even though it is closely related. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
::: Seconded. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||