Optimal patent val: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>

This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:

: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2011-11-30 03:09:32 UTC</tt>.

: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2011-11-30 03:14:59 UTC</tt>.

: The original revision id was <tt>~~280486194~~</tt>.

: The original revision id was <tt>280486922</tt>.

: The revision comment was: <tt></tt>

The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.

Line 12:

By tempering a JI scale using N-edo found on the list below we automatically temper it to the corresponding temperament. This can be done in [[http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/|Scala]] using the Quantize command: either type in "Quantize/consistent N" on the bottom, or use the pull-down menu under "Modify", check the box saying "Consistent" and type N (without a decimal point) into "Resolution".

To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q ~~<=~~ p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the [[POTE tuning]] and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d < 600/N, from which it follows that N < 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e < 600/N and so N < 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N < 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.

To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q ≤ p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the [[POTE tuning]] and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d < 600/N, from which it follows that N < 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e < 600/N and so N < 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N < 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.

Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent vals are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, "12f" adjusts a patent val for 12 in the 13-limit or above, for instance <12 19 28 34 42 44|, to <12 19 28 34 42 45| (which is actually a better mapping, and hence more useful for this purpose.)

Line 499:

By tempering a JI scale using N-edo found on the list below we automatically temper it to the corresponding temperament. This can be done in <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/" rel="nofollow">Scala</a> using the Quantize command: either type in &quot;Quantize/consistent N&quot; on the bottom, or use the pull-down menu under &quot;Modify&quot;, check the box saying &quot;Consistent&quot; and type N (without a decimal point) into &quot;Resolution&quot;.

To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q ~~&lt;=~~ p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the <a class="wiki_link" href="/POTE%20tuning">POTE tuning</a> and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &lt; 600/N and so N &lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.

To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q ≤ p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the <a class="wiki_link" href="/POTE%20tuning">POTE tuning</a> and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &lt; 600/N and so N &lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.

Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent vals are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&amp;10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, &quot;12f&quot; adjusts a patent val for 12 in the 13-limit or above, for instance &lt;12 19 28 34 42 44|, to &lt;12 19 28 34 42 45| (which is actually a better mapping, and hence more useful for this purpose.)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
 This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
-: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2011-11-30 03:09:32 UTC</tt>.<br>
+: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2011-11-30 03:14:59 UTC</tt>.<br>
-: The original revision id was <tt>280486194</tt>.<br>
+: The original revision id was <tt>280486922</tt>.<br>
 : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
 The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 By tempering a JI scale using N-edo found on the list below we automatically temper it to the corresponding temperament. This can be done in [[http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/|Scala]] using the Quantize command: either type in "Quantize/consistent N" on the bottom, or use the pull-down menu under "Modify", check the box saying "Consistent" and type N (without a decimal point) into "Resolution".
-To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q &lt;= p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the [[POTE tuning]] and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &lt; 600/N and so N &lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.
+To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q ≤ p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the [[POTE tuning]] and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &lt; 600/N and so N &lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.
 Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent vals are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&amp;10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, "12f" adjusts a patent val for 12 in the 13-limit or above, for instance &lt;12 19 28 34 42 44|, to &lt;12 19 28 34 42 45| (which is actually a better mapping, and hence more useful for this purpose.)
@@ Line 499: / Line 499: @@
 By tempering a JI scale using N-edo found on the list below we automatically temper it to the corresponding temperament. This can be done in &lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Scala&lt;/a&gt; using the Quantize command: either type in &amp;quot;Quantize/consistent N&amp;quot; on the bottom, or use the pull-down menu under &amp;quot;Modify&amp;quot;, check the box saying &amp;quot;Consistent&amp;quot; and type N (without a decimal point) into &amp;quot;Resolution&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
-To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q &amp;lt;= p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/POTE%20tuning"&gt;POTE tuning&lt;/a&gt; and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &amp;lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &amp;lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &amp;lt; 600/N and so N &amp;lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &amp;lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.&lt;br /&gt;
+To limit the search range when finding the optimal patent val a useful observation is this: given N-edo, and an odd prime q ≤ p, if d is the absolute value in cents of the difference between the tuning of q given by the &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/POTE%20tuning"&gt;POTE tuning&lt;/a&gt; and the POTE tuning rounded to the nearest N-edo value, then d &amp;lt; 600/N, from which it follows that N &amp;lt; 600/d. Likewise, if e is the absolute value of the error of q in the patent val tuning, then e &amp;lt; 600/N and so N &amp;lt; 600/e. If N-edo defines an optimal patent val, then the patent val will be identical to the val obtained by rounding the POTE tuning to the nearest N-edo value. We have two distances from the patent val, one to the POTE tuning and one to the the JI tuning, both bounded by 600/N, and so by the triangle inequality the distance from the JI tuning to the POTE tuning, which is the error of the prime q in the POTE tuning, is bounded by 1200/N. Hence, N &amp;lt; 1200/error(q). If now we take the minimum value for 1200/error(prime) for all the odd primes up to p, we obtain an upper bound for N.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 Below are tabulated some values. In each case an identifier which uniquely identifies the temperament in question is given. In the codimension one case, where the temperament is defined by a single comma, the comma is given and used as a name. In other cases, for a temperament of rank n, n independent vals are given. Normally this is by way of integers conjoined by ampersands, such as 2&amp;amp;10 for 7-limit pajara. This tells us we can use the 7-limit patent vals for 2 and 10 to define the temperament. In case n independent patent vals cannot be found, vals using the Keenan notation are given; this adjusts the nth prime mapping to its second-best value by appending the nth lower-case letter in alphabetical order. Thus, &amp;quot;12f&amp;quot; adjusts a patent val for 12 in the 13-limit or above, for instance &amp;lt;12 19 28 34 42 44|, to &amp;lt;12 19 28 34 42 45| (which is actually a better mapping, and hence more useful for this purpose.)&lt;br /&gt;