Talk:Pajara: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:


:::: I mean using the ''p''-norm as ''p'' approaches infinity. Alternatively, discarding the bounding intervals and balancing the rest would make sense too. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC) (last edited [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:14, 1 March 2026 (UTC))
:::: I mean using the ''p''-norm as ''p'' approaches infinity. Alternatively, discarding the bounding intervals and balancing the rest would make sense too. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC) (last edited [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:14, 1 March 2026 (UTC))
::::: Why are least-squares tunings being called "minimax" here? The most consistent tiebreaker should be second largest error (largest error except for 7/5~10/7). [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 03:07, 2 March 2026 (UTC)


== Unclear/questionable paragraph ==
== Unclear/questionable paragraph ==
Return to "Pajara" page.