Talk:Amity family: Difference between revisions

Line 21:

: I've been thinking this temperament needs to be renamed also, but I wasn't sure if anyone else besides me really thought this was the case until now. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

== Extensions ==

; Amity

: The mapping for 11 is obviously problematic as it excludes half of the tuning range, tho unless someone has a good name I don't mind keeping it. More importantly the mapping for 17 is weak, and so this branch (whatever name it uses) could go straight to no-17 19-limit.

; Hitchcock

: The mapping for 19 makes little sense. Even the 17 is questionable. Should be clipped at least after the 17-limit.

; Stalagmite

: Misses an obvious 23-limit extension, tho the mapping for 19 is questionable so we need to decide if it's full or no-19 23-limit.

; Accord

: Misses an obvious 13-limit extension (39df & 46).

; Paramity

: The mapping for 17 is weak. Could go straight to no-17 19-limit.

; Trinity

: The mapping for 17 is problematic. Should branch to 152fg & 311 and 159 & 311 in the 17-limit. Note that 463 is dual-13 dual-17 (463fg has a slightly lower 17-limit TE error than 463). The base temperament could be no-17 29-limit.

—[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 : I've been thinking this temperament needs to be renamed also, but I wasn't sure if anyone else besides me really thought this was the case until now. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
+== Extensions ==
+; Amity
+: The mapping for 11 is obviously problematic as it excludes half of the tuning range, tho unless someone has a good name I don't mind keeping it. More importantly the mapping for 17 is weak, and so this branch (whatever name it uses) could go straight to no-17 19-limit.
+; Hitchcock
+: The mapping for 19 makes little sense. Even the 17 is questionable. Should be clipped at least after the 17-limit.
+; Stalagmite
+: Misses an obvious 23-limit extension, tho the mapping for 19 is questionable so we need to decide if it's full or no-19 23-limit.
+; Accord
+: Misses an obvious 13-limit extension (39df & 46).
+; Paramity
+: The mapping for 17 is weak. Could go straight to no-17 19-limit.
+; Trinity
+: The mapping for 17 is problematic. Should branch to 152fg & 311 and 159 & 311 in the 17-limit. Note that 463 is dual-13 dual-17 (463fg has a slightly lower 17-limit TE error than 463). The base temperament could be no-17 29-limit.
+—[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:04, 3 June 2026 (UTC)