User:Overthink/EDO impressions: Difference between revisions
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
19: Due to the flat tendency of the system, melody seems to have a feeling that is hard to describe, that you can't replicate with 12edo. So far my biggest issue is that the minor seconds are too wide. | 19: Due to the flat tendency of the system, melody seems to have a feeling that is hard to describe, that you can't replicate with 12edo. So far my biggest issue is that the minor seconds are too wide. | ||
22: The diatonic scale sounds even brighter than in 17, with thirds and sixths having a more obvious septimal flavor. | 22: The diatonic scale sounds even brighter than in 17, with thirds and sixths having a more obvious septimal flavor. The diatonic semitone is a little smaller than ideal, but still usable. | ||
31: TBA | 31: TBA | ||
41: | 41: While this EDO has be cited as good for approximating JI, it has quite a few problems. For example, 5/4 is too flat, and 7/4 is too flat. In general pental and septimal intervals are too far from their nearest pythagorean intervals, as the comma step is over 29 cents. | ||
53: | 53: Excellent 5- and 7-limit harmonies. 5/4 is now only slightly flat, and the 7/4 is a bit sharp. Chords are significantly more consonant than in 41. Definitely would recommend. | ||
72: TBA | 72: TBA | ||