User talk:Eliora/2592edo: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Eliora (talk | contribs)
Fredg999 (talk | contribs)
m Fredg999 moved page Talk:2592edo to User talk:Eliora/2592edo without leaving a redirect: XW:NG
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 04:52, 4 August 2025

Notability

I don't think this page meets the notability guidelines. I understand that this edo is the optimal patent val of one particular temperament (whose notability is either tenuous or insufficiently explained) and has a lot of divisors. Unfortunately, the first aspect is most likely the case of a very large number of edos in the thousands, and the second aspect, as far as I know, isn't a particularly notable aspect, especially in edos of that size (for the vast majority of musicians, should I specify). I believe it's sufficient that this edo figures in the optimal patent val list of windrose temperament, but otherwise I'll consider deleting this page per XW:NG. --Fredg999 (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

+1 Delete – Sintel🎏 (talk) 15:29, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
A compromise: I ask that the page be reinstated and then contents moved to User:Eliora/2592edo, so I can work on my niche edos without clogging up the main namespace if the ideas aren't notable enough. Eliora (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2025 (UTC)