Talk:1352/1331: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Replied |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Also, archaeotonic and oneirotonic are both Lovecraft references, so I don't think people really make a big deal out of this. | Also, archaeotonic and oneirotonic are both Lovecraft references, so I don't think people really make a big deal out of this. | ||
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC) | – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC) | ||
: The original purpose of the "controversial names" category was to act like a todo category. I wasn't actually the first to complain about this comma, others had complained about it on Discord, so I lumped it in with the others in that category. | |||
: But since then, every other page in that category has either been renamed, or deemed not controversial abd removed, leaving this page alone in the category. | |||
: Since the todo issue had not been resolved,I needed this page to still be in some kind of todo category. But it was silly to have it in a category all its own. Hence me moving it to the "discuss title" category by using that mbox. | |||
: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 11:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:06, 25 April 2025
|
Todo: discuss title
Is Lovecraft too divisive a figure for a comma and temperament to be named after, given his hard-line racist views even for the time? |
Why post your comment as a todo template instead of using the talk page like usual? Also, archaeotonic and oneirotonic are both Lovecraft references, so I don't think people really make a big deal out of this. – Sintel🎏 (talk) 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- The original purpose of the "controversial names" category was to act like a todo category. I wasn't actually the first to complain about this comma, others had complained about it on Discord, so I lumped it in with the others in that category.
- But since then, every other page in that category has either been renamed, or deemed not controversial abd removed, leaving this page alone in the category.
- Since the todo issue had not been resolved,I needed this page to still be in some kind of todo category. But it was silly to have it in a category all its own. Hence me moving it to the "discuss title" category by using that mbox.
- --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)