Breedsmic temperaments: Difference between revisions

Xenllium (talk | contribs)
Hemififths: cleanup, review and +error maps
Line 27: Line 27:
{{Main| Hemififths }}
{{Main| Hemififths }}


Hemififths tempers out [[5120/5103]], the hemifamity comma, and [[10976/10935]], hemimage. It has a neutral third as a generator, with [[99edo]] and [[140edo]] providing good tunings, and [[239edo]] an even better one; and other possible tunings are 160<sup>(1/25)</sup>, giving just 5's, the 7- and 9-odd-limit minimax tuning, or 14<sup>(1/13)</sup>, giving just 7's. It may be called the 41 &amp; 58 temperament. It requires 25 generator steps to get to the class for the harmonic 5, whereas the 7 is half as complex, and hence hemififths makes for a good no-fives temperament, to which the 17- and 24-note mos are suited. The full force of this highly accurate temperament can be found using the 41-note mos or even the 34-note 2mos{{clarify}}.
Hemififths may be described as the {{nowrap| 41 & 58 }} temperament, tempering out [[5120/5103]], the hemifamity comma, and [[10976/10935]], hemimage. It has a neutral third as a generator; its [[ploidacot]] is dicot. [[99edo]] and [[140edo]] provides good tunings, and [[239edo]] an even better one; and other possible tunings are 160<sup>(1/25)</sup>, giving just 5's, the 7- and 9-odd-limit minimax tuning, or 14<sup>(1/13)</sup>, giving just 7's. It requires 25 generator steps to get to the class for the harmonic 5, whereas the 7 is half as complex, and hence hemififths makes for a good no-fives temperament, to which the 17- and 24-note mos are suited. The full force of this highly accurate temperament can be found using the 41-note mos or even the 34-note 2mos{{clarify}}.


By adding [[243/242]] (which also means [[441/440]], [[540/539]] and [[896/891]]) to the commas, hemififths extends to a less accurate 11-limit version, but one where 11/4 is only five generator steps. 99edo is an excellent tuning; one which loses little of the accuracy of the 7-limit but improves the 11-limit a bit. Now adding [[144/143]] brings in the 13-limit with less accuracy yet, but with very low complexity, as the generator can be taken to be [[16/13]]. 99 remains a good tuning choice.
By adding [[243/242]] (which also means [[441/440]], [[540/539]] and [[896/891]]) to the commas, hemififths extends to a less accurate 11-limit version, but one where 11/4 is only five generator steps. 99edo is an excellent tuning; one which loses little of the accuracy of the 7-limit but improves the 11-limit a bit. Now adding [[144/143]] brings in the 13-limit with less accuracy yet, but with very low complexity, as the generator can be taken to be [[16/13]]. 99 remains a good tuning choice.
Line 42: Line 42:


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1\1, ~49/40 = 351.4464
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~49/40 = 351.4464
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1\1, ~49/40 = 351.477
: [[error map]]: {{val| 0.0000 +0.9379 -0.1531 -0.0224 }}
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~49/40 = 351.4774
: error map: {{val| 0.0000 +0.9999 +0.6221 +0.0307 }}


[[Minimax tuning]]:
[[Minimax tuning]]:
Line 54: Line 56:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 58, 99, 239, 338 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 58, 99, 239, 338 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.022243
[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.022243


=== 11-limit ===
=== 11-limit ===
Line 64: Line 66:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.4289
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~11/9 = 351.4289
* POTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.521
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~11/9 = 351.5206


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 41, 58, 99e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 41, 58, 99e }}


Badness: 0.023498
Badness (Smith): 0.023498


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 79: Line 81:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.4331
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~11/9 = 351.4331
* POTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.573
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~11/9 = 351.5734


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17c, 41, 58, 99ef, 157eff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 41, 58, 99ef, 157eff }}


Badness: 0.019090
Badness (Smith): 0.019090


=== Semihemi ===
=== Semihemi ===
Line 96: Line 98:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~99/70 = 1\2, ~49/40 = 351.4722
* CTE: ~99/70 = 600.0000, ~49/40 = 351.4722
* POTE: ~99/70 = 1\2, ~49/40 = 351.505
* POTE: ~99/70 = 600.0000, ~49/40 = 351.5047


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 58, 140, 198 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 58, 140, 198 }}


Badness: 0.042487
Badness (Smith): 0.042487


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 111: Line 113:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~99/70 = 1\2, ~49/40 = 351.4674
* CTE: ~99/70 = 600.0000, ~49/40 = 351.4674
* POTE: ~99/70 = 1\2, ~49/40 = 351.502
* POTE: ~99/70 = 600.0000, ~49/40 = 351.5019


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 58, 140, 198, 536f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 58, 140, 198, 536f }}


Badness: 0.021188
Badness (Smith): 0.021188


=== Quadrafifths ===
=== Quadrafifths ===
This has been logged as ''semihemififths'' in Graham Breed's temperament finder, but ''quadrafifths'' arguably makes more sense.  
This has been logged as ''semihemififths'' in Graham Breed's temperament finder, but ''quadrafifths'' arguably makes more sense because it straight-up splits the fifth in four.  


Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11
Line 130: Line 132:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~243/220 = 175.7284
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~243/220 = 175.7284
* POTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~243/220 = 175.7378
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~243/220 = 175.7378


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 41, 157, 198, 239, 676b, 915be }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 41, 157, 198, 239, 676b, 915be }}


Badness: 0.040170
Badness (Smith): 0.040170


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 145: Line 147:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~72/65 = 175.7412
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~72/65 = 175.7412
* POTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~72/65 = 175.7470
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.0000, ~72/65 = 175.7470


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 41, 157, 198, 437f, 635bcff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 41, 157, 198, 437f, 635bcff }}


Badness: 0.031144
Badness (Smith): 0.031144


== Tertiaseptal ==
== Tertiaseptal ==