Kite's thoughts on enharmonic unisons: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:35, 24 December 2024 view source TallKite (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Sysops 3,990 edits m →See also Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:17, 24 December 2024 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,129 edits m Add Wikipedia box Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Wikipedia\| Enharmonic equivalence }}
	The notation of every temperament, including every edo, has at least one '''enharmonic unison''', abbreviated as '''EU''' (with one rare exception, see below). An EU is by definition enharmonically equivalent to a perfect unison. (''Enharmonically equivalent'' is used here in the modern sense of "the same exact pitch, merely named differently".) Any note or interval can be respelled by adding or subtracting an EU.		The notation of every temperament, including every edo, has at least one '''enharmonic unison''', abbreviated as '''EU''' (with one rare exception, see below). An EU is by definition enharmonically equivalent to a perfect unison. (''Enharmonically equivalent'' is used here in the modern sense of "the same exact pitch, merely named differently".) Any note or interval can be respelled by adding or subtracting an EU.