User:Contribution/Chanofreq Project: Difference between revisions

Contribution (talk | contribs)
Contribution (talk | contribs)
Line 55: Line 55:
* Would it be advisable to offer modes B and C, given that significant errors can arise with 64-bit floats when using large exponents?
* Would it be advisable to offer modes B and C, given that significant errors can arise with 64-bit floats when using large exponents?
* Should hexadecimal representation of frequencies be allowed as an alternative to decimal?
* Should hexadecimal representation of frequencies be allowed as an alternative to decimal?
* Should the bitfreq workaround be maintained, or should the standard align with OddSound’s 64-bit floating-point format?}}
* Should the bitfreq workaround be maintained, or should the standard align with OddSound’s 64-bit floating-point format?
* Mode B and C could use cents with 7 decimal places (one billionth of a 12edo semitone)}}


== Syntax ==
== Syntax ==