Talk:Constrained tuning: Difference between revisions

Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
Line 53: Line 53:


:::::: The "exp-Weil" tuning, or whatever you want to call it, which weights intervals by max(n,d) instead of log(max(n,d)), is probably really important. I haven't thought through what the convex hull is yet. I'm not really sure if it's just the skewed Wilson norm. This would be good to figure out. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 09:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::: The "exp-Weil" tuning, or whatever you want to call it, which weights intervals by max(n,d) instead of log(max(n,d)), is probably really important. I haven't thought through what the convex hull is yet. I'm not really sure if it's just the skewed Wilson norm. This would be good to figure out. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 09:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
::::::: Well it's not as systematic as in D&D's guide, but I'm not super fond of their terminology since it something completely new. I'm just trying to add the missing pieces with minimal changes to existing materials.
::::::: Since Hahn is a norm with a parameter for the maximum relevant odd limit, it's not the same as the equilateral/nonweighted norm whenever the odd limit > 7, and so is the unskewed variant. I'm adding support for them in my code.
::::::: Interesting that Wilson and Benedetti aren't the same in subgroup tunings. I never thought about that before. It appears to me that Wilson is the most straightforward choice, so I'm not sure why you'd insist on using Benedetti. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Return to "Constrained tuning" page.