27edo: Difference between revisions

Theory: restore "they both support the augene temperament"
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
Unexplained removal
Line 11: Line 11:


Though the [[7-limit]] tuning of 27edo is not highly accurate, it nonetheless is the smallest equal division to represent the 7-odd-limit both [[consistent]]ly and distinctly – that is, everything in the [[7-odd-limit]] diamond is uniquely represented by a certain number of steps of 27edo. It also represents the 13th harmonic very well, and performs quite decently as a 2.3.5.7.13 temperament. It also approximates [[19/10]], [[19/12]], and [[19/14]], so 0-7-13-25 does quite well as a 10:12:14:19; the major seventh 25\27 is less than a cent off from 19/10. Octave-inverted, these also form a quite convincing approximation of the main Bohlen-Pierce triad, 3:5:7, making it the smallest edo that can simulate tritave harmony, although it rapidly becomes quite rough if extended to the 9 and above, unlike a true tritave based system.
Though the [[7-limit]] tuning of 27edo is not highly accurate, it nonetheless is the smallest equal division to represent the 7-odd-limit both [[consistent]]ly and distinctly – that is, everything in the [[7-odd-limit]] diamond is uniquely represented by a certain number of steps of 27edo. It also represents the 13th harmonic very well, and performs quite decently as a 2.3.5.7.13 temperament. It also approximates [[19/10]], [[19/12]], and [[19/14]], so 0-7-13-25 does quite well as a 10:12:14:19; the major seventh 25\27 is less than a cent off from 19/10. Octave-inverted, these also form a quite convincing approximation of the main Bohlen-Pierce triad, 3:5:7, making it the smallest edo that can simulate tritave harmony, although it rapidly becomes quite rough if extended to the 9 and above, unlike a true tritave based system.
Its step, as well as the octave-inverted and octave-equivalent versions of it, holds the distinction for having around the highest [[harmonic entropy]] possible and thus is, in theory, most dissonant, assuming the relatively common values of ''a'' = 2 and ''s'' = 1%. This property is shared with all edos between around 24 and 30. Intervals smaller than this tend to be perceived as unison and are more consonant as a result; intervals larger than this have less "tension" and thus are also more consonant.


The 27-note system or one similar like a well temperament can be notated by a variation on the quartertone accidentals. In this case a sharp raises a note by 4 edosteps, just one edostep beneath the following nominal (for example C to C# describes the approximate 10/9 and 11/10 interval) and the flat conversely lowers: these are augmented unisons and diminished unisons. Just so, one finds that an accidental can be divided in half, and this fill the remaining places without need for double sharps and double flats. Enharmonically then, E double flat means C half sharp. In other words, the resemblance to quarter tone notation differs in enharmonic divergence. The notes from C to D are C, D flat, C half-sharp, D half-flat, C sharp, D. Unfortunately, some ascending intervals appear to be descending on the staff. Furthermore, the 3rd of a 4:5:6 or 10:12:15 chord must be notated as either a 2nd or a 4th, since a major third from C is C–D♯ rather than C–E and a minor third from C is now C–F♭ instead of C–E♭. The composer can decide for themselves which addidional accidental pair is necessary if they will need redundancy to remedy these problems, and to keep the chromatic pitches within a compass on paper relative to the natural names (C, D, E etc.). Otherwise it is simple enough, and the same tendency for A# to be higher than Bb is not only familiar, though here very exaggerated, to those working with the Pythagorean scale, but also to many classically trained violinists.
The 27-note system or one similar like a well temperament can be notated by a variation on the quartertone accidentals. In this case a sharp raises a note by 4 edosteps, just one edostep beneath the following nominal (for example C to C# describes the approximate 10/9 and 11/10 interval) and the flat conversely lowers: these are augmented unisons and diminished unisons. Just so, one finds that an accidental can be divided in half, and this fill the remaining places without need for double sharps and double flats. Enharmonically then, E double flat means C half sharp. In other words, the resemblance to quarter tone notation differs in enharmonic divergence. The notes from C to D are C, D flat, C half-sharp, D half-flat, C sharp, D. Unfortunately, some ascending intervals appear to be descending on the staff. Furthermore, the 3rd of a 4:5:6 or 10:12:15 chord must be notated as either a 2nd or a 4th, since a major third from C is C–D♯ rather than C–E and a minor third from C is now C–F♭ instead of C–E♭. The composer can decide for themselves which addidional accidental pair is necessary if they will need redundancy to remedy these problems, and to keep the chromatic pitches within a compass on paper relative to the natural names (C, D, E etc.). Otherwise it is simple enough, and the same tendency for A# to be higher than Bb is not only familiar, though here very exaggerated, to those working with the Pythagorean scale, but also to many classically trained violinists.