User:CompactStar/Nonoctave extension of ups and downs notation: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
CompactStar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There seems to be somewhat less standardization in terms of notation for nonoctave scales compared to octave-equivalent scales. Here I will outline some notations for nonoctave scales, largely based on [[ups and downs notation]] and [[TAMNAMS]], with the most common periods (3/2, 3/1, 4/1) being prioritized.
There seems to be somewhat less standardization of notation for nonoctave scales compared to octave-equivalent scales. So, here I will outline some notations for nonoctave scales, largely based on [[ups and downs notation]] and [[TAMNAMS]], with the most common periods (e.g. 3/2, 3/1, 4/1) being prioritized.


== Fifth-equivalent notation ==
== 3/2-equivalent notation ==




== Tritave-equivalent notation ==
== 3/1-equivalent notation ==
For no-twos scales we can apply the Pythagorean principle of using the next highest prime number as the generator, and use ~[[5/3]] (rather than ~[[3/2]]) as a generator for the equivalent of the diatonic scale.

Revision as of 09:03, 31 May 2023

There seems to be somewhat less standardization of notation for nonoctave scales compared to octave-equivalent scales. So, here I will outline some notations for nonoctave scales, largely based on ups and downs notation and TAMNAMS, with the most common periods (e.g. 3/2, 3/1, 4/1) being prioritized.

3/2-equivalent notation

3/1-equivalent notation

For no-twos scales we can apply the Pythagorean principle of using the next highest prime number as the generator, and use ~5/3 (rather than ~3/2) as a generator for the equivalent of the diatonic scale.