Template talk:Infobox ET: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
::: The only thing I can think of as a use for a modified version of the M3 line is as the representation for [[5/4]] for systems that have a consistent representation of it- and this merely because 5/4 is such a common reference point for major thirds. I wouldn't bother with those systems where 5/4 can reasonably be mapped to one of two possible EDO-steps. Other than that, I do indeed think that adding the M3 line is questionable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC) | ::: The only thing I can think of as a use for a modified version of the M3 line is as the representation for [[5/4]] for systems that have a consistent representation of it- and this merely because 5/4 is such a common reference point for major thirds. I wouldn't bother with those systems where 5/4 can reasonably be mapped to one of two possible EDO-steps. Other than that, I do indeed think that adding the M3 line is questionable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: There's the prime harmonics table for that, and assuming the diatonic major third to be consistent with 5/4 is very meantone-centric anyway. The semitone ratio is already plenty of information. I agree that the M3 field should be removed, because it adds more clutter for no new significant information. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 22:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Consistency level == | == Consistency level == | ||