Talk:Tempered monzos and vals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →Link back to less-technical article focusing only on "tmonzo": thanks for adding the link! (removing section for requesting it) Tag: Replaced |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | {{WSArchiveLink}} | ||
== Unnecessary formalization == | |||
The formal definitions given here: | |||
: Mathematically, a regular temperament is a homomorphism (a kind of function) from the space of just intervals to the space of tempered intervals generated by that temperament, where both these spaces are abelian groups. Technically, a regular temperament is an equivalence class of functions separated by unimodular transformations, which represent the same temperament. | |||
are completely out of place, and furthermore they are inconsistent with definitions given elsewhere (such as on [[Mathematical theory of regular temperaments]], which I would consider "canonical" despite the many problems of that page). I would just remove them entirely since they don't add anything. | |||
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:34, 22 April 2025
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Unnecessary formalization
The formal definitions given here:
- Mathematically, a regular temperament is a homomorphism (a kind of function) from the space of just intervals to the space of tempered intervals generated by that temperament, where both these spaces are abelian groups. Technically, a regular temperament is an equivalence class of functions separated by unimodular transformations, which represent the same temperament.
are completely out of place, and furthermore they are inconsistent with definitions given elsewhere (such as on Mathematical theory of regular temperaments, which I would consider "canonical" despite the many problems of that page). I would just remove them entirely since they don't add anything.