Talk:Mapping to lattice: Difference between revisions
re |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
--[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 23:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC) | --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 23:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC) | ||
: Not sure, sorry. I didn't come up with the concept and I'm not a fan of it. It just bothered me that it was never explained anywhere. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 04:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
:: One theory is that it uses the Minkowski lattice basis, explained in the ''rank-3 temperament'' page. Still it's not fundamentally different from the mapping as we've discussed on Discord, so this piece of information is a little bit redundant without providing much insight. I remember a few of us have proposed removing it from the temp catalog pages. What do you think? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
::: I agree it adds little value (possibly negative value), and so I support not including it in a temperament template. But I believe it's generally not a good idea to straight up delete information from the wiki that someone might find useful. So perhaps we could consider centralizing all the existing map-to-lattice information in one place? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 16:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::: Right. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC) | |||