Talk:List of interesting fifths: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Can anyone explain why the peppermint fifth, which seems logarithmically-based, is so close to one based on acoustic phi?" |
Grand Unified Table of Fifths? |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can anyone explain why the peppermint fifth, which seems logarithmically-based, is so close to one based on acoustic phi? | Can anyone explain why the peppermint fifth, which seems logarithmically-based, is so close to one based on acoustic phi? | ||
== Grand Unified Table of Fifths? == | |||
Anybody have any thoughts on a conversion of this page into a Grand Unified Table of Fifths? A table like the (Septimal) Meantone tuning spectrum table would be a good start, with the addition of columns for Eigenmonzos when appliicable, and for relevant temperaments and their extensions. Of course, some thought would need to go into how to keep this readable on a non-humongous monitor. | |||
[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:27, 7 August 2024
Can anyone explain why the peppermint fifth, which seems logarithmically-based, is so close to one based on acoustic phi?
Grand Unified Table of Fifths?
Anybody have any thoughts on a conversion of this page into a Grand Unified Table of Fifths? A table like the (Septimal) Meantone tuning spectrum table would be a good start, with the addition of columns for Eigenmonzos when appliicable, and for relevant temperaments and their extensions. Of course, some thought would need to go into how to keep this readable on a non-humongous monitor. Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk) 05:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)