Talk:Diminished family: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "== Naming conflict == In ''jubilismic clan'' there's another extension of {648/625} sharing the name ''hemidim''. ~~~~"
 
m FloraC moved page Talk:Dimipent family to Talk:Diminished family: Community consensus
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Naming conflict ==
== Naming conflict ==
In ''jubilismic clan'' there's another extension of {648/625} sharing the name ''hemidim''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
In ''jubilismic clan'' there's another extension of {648/625} sharing the name ''hemidim''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
: Update: resolved. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
== Ditch ''dimipent'' in favor of ''diminished''? ==
Given diminished is the only strong septimal extension that makes any sense, this distinction seems unnecessary. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
I vote in favor of ditching ''dimipent''. [[User:MisterShafXen|MisterShafXen]] ([[User talk:MisterShafXen|talk]]) 15:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:11, 21 August 2025

Naming conflict

In jubilismic clan there's another extension of {648/625} sharing the name hemidim. FloraC (talk) 11:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Update: resolved. FloraC (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Ditch dimipent in favor of diminished?

Given diminished is the only strong septimal extension that makes any sense, this distinction seems unnecessary. FloraC (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

I vote in favor of ditching dimipent. MisterShafXen (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)