Talk:Garischismic clan: Difference between revisions
re |
→Terminology question: addendum: sadly still questionable |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Seems it's explained here: [[Tour of Regular Temperaments #Clans defined by a 2.3.7 (za) comma]]. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | : Seems it's explained here: [[Tour of Regular Temperaments #Clans defined by a 2.3.7 (za) comma]]. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: This is great news. 🙂 I already asked for this but got no answer. It also makes sense if we (hopefully most people) feel that clans are larger than families. So two categories [[:Category:Family]] and [[:Category:Clan]] will make sense. Maybe the main articles (on top of these categories) could be combined into one article [[Temperament families and clans]] (maybe with redirects from [[family]] and [[clan]]). I don't like the idea that one have to read a whole book for just one definition or one distinction. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 08:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: I'm still not sure if this is the full truth. I saw examples of families having the same number of primes as clans. I'm a bit confused but anyway started the description page [[temperament families and clans]]. I hope that someone more experienced than me will help to improve the article. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 15:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | |||