Talk:Magic family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage |
Update |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | {{WSArchiveLink}} | ||
== New temperament - not sure if it exists == | |||
Warlock: tempers out 16807/16384 and 3125/3072. It is exceptionally well-tuned in 60edo. [[User:Jerdle|Jerdle]] ([[User talk:Jerdle|talk]]) 01:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
: <s>Just curious, who named this temperament? May I find one and name it too? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)</s> | |||
:: I named it after looking for interesting commas.[[User:Jerdle|Jerdle]] ([[User talk:Jerdle|talk]]) | |||
:: Can I ask what the generator for this is? --[[User:CritDeathX|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX|talk]]) 15:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: T8/7 (240¢) and T5/4 (~380¢). The 100¢ generator is probably 256/245.[[User:Jerdle|Jerdle]] ([[User talk:Jerdle|talk]]) | |||
::: I ran it thru the temperament finder and my own code. This is the 25 & 35 temperament. Commas: 3125/3072, 16803/16384. Map: [<5 10 12 14|, <0 -5 -1 0|]. Wedgie: <<25 5 0 -50 -70 -13||. POTE generator: 100.1869. Badness: 0.287. Fits high badness temperament :) [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::: Surprised by that. Using 60edo values, 7/4 is 960¢ (pretty accurate), 5/4 is 380¢ (still accurate, better than augmented), and 3/2 is 700¢ (pretty accurate). [[User:Jerdle|Jerdle]] ([[User talk:Jerdle|talk]] | |||
: No wonder it fits 60edo so well. After tempering out 245/243 to allow the generator to represent 256/243, not just 256/245, it becomes 60edo. | |||
: Maybe we'll log this anyway. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:51, 30 July 2021
![]() |
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
New temperament - not sure if it exists
Warlock: tempers out 16807/16384 and 3125/3072. It is exceptionally well-tuned in 60edo. Jerdle (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Just curious, who named this temperament? May I find one and name it too? FloraC (talk) 06:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Can I ask what the generator for this is? --CritDeathX (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- No wonder it fits 60edo so well. After tempering out 245/243 to allow the generator to represent 256/243, not just 256/245, it becomes 60edo.