Talk:Dyadic chord: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''... |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | |||
== Query on mention of 36/35 -- is 36/25 meant? == | |||
There are references to 36/35 and 10/7 differing by 126/125, the starling comma. Could this mean 36/25, or (6/5)^2? [[User:Mschulter1325|Mschulter1325]] 07:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
-- | : Yeah, 36/25 and 10/7 differ by 126/125. I just checked in Wolfram Alpha. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
== | == Move to "dyadically consonant chord" == | ||
To me, "dyadic chord" most intuitively means "chord that is a dyad". | |||
== On anomalous saturated suspensions == | |||
I can't keep a straight face whilst looking at this section, I'm too childish I may admit, but it's kind of an unfortunate acronym. I propose it to be renamed to something like AnSaS or related. | |||
: <s>I don't share that feeling but maybe that's becuz English isn't my first language.</s> I use ''saturated suspension'', omitting ''anomalous'' cuz I don't think it conveys anything. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC) (Updated [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC)) | |||
: <small>P.S. plz remember to sign your comment with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>.</small> | |||
== | == Chord classification == | ||
Some temperaments temper out commas that lead chords which otherwise come in otonal-utonal pairs to become neutralized, such as 7:8:9 and 9:10:11 in superpyth. In [[Chords of huygens]], the neutralized 8:9:10 and 11:14:18 chords are both classified as otonal, while in [[Chords of mohajira]], the neutralized 10:11:12 chord is classified as utonal. I believe this is based on the transversal, as the 8:9:10, 11:14:18, and 10:11:12 chords are generated as 1-9/8-5/4, 1-14/9-11/9, and 1-20/11-5/3 respectively. However, classifying these chords as otonal or utonal is misleading, so there should be a convention; perhaps ambitonal, or another term entirely.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 23:17, 13 December 2025 (UTC) | |||
- ' | : These are actually plurichords that change their o/u-tonality on different interpretations. I would suggest marking them as both otonal/utonal, which is a meaningful distinction to make from ambitonal. Perhaps it's also good to explicitly mark their plurichord nature and the associated temperaments, if we can find a way to do so. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC) | ||
== | == Det chord vs innate comma chord == | ||
is it | For cataloguing chords of specific temperaments, this distinction is pointless. I have no idea why it was made in these tables in the first place. | ||
The definition of innate comma chords seems problematic, as it's not clear how it's more specific than ordinary high-odd-limit chords. | |||
—[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC) | |||