|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
|
| == It's a start == | | == "Technically does not miss"... what? == |
| Okay, well it's rather jumbled, so feel free to improve it however you like, but it's a start.
| |
|
| |
|
| Ideally there would be something on MOSes in tritaves, or in non octaves, because they're completely different. But I've only scratched the iceberg on that.
| | I don't understand this phrase that appears 41 times in the EDT-EDO correspondence table: "technically does not entirely miss 2/1 due to having a step of...". What does "technically missing 2/1" mean? If no one can explain it I'm going to delete this wording, since it makes no sense to me. —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 23:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC) |
| | |
| - '''Kosmorsky''' August 26, 2011, 08:26:16 PM UTC-0700 | |
| ----
| |
| Hey, I just noticed this page and its satellite pages. I'm glad to see a systematic approach to equal divisions of the tritave. A nice start indeed!
| |
| | |
| - '''Andrew_Heathwaite''' September 03, 2011, 03:34:48 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Added a lot of info, cleaned up some technical things, tried to make it more concise. If you think I removed too much feel free to put it back.
| |
| | |
| - '''mbattaglia1''' September 07, 2011, 12:09:13 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Same as Mike.
| |
| | |
| - '''Sarzadoce''' September 07, 2011, 01:16:58 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Hope you don't mind that I removed about 2 of your sentences Mike. I did attempt to transplant them in another relevant location.
| |
| | |
| - '''Sarzadoce''' September 07, 2011, 01:19:10 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |