Talk:Inflections and alterations: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 09:23, 16 July 2025 view source VectorGraphics (talk \| contribs) 2,403 edits →This should not be its own page: new section		Latest revision as of 03:47, 17 July 2025 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,449 edits →This should not be its own page: Re (announce merge)
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'd rather not create awkward separations between microtonal theory and standard music theory when they aren't necessary. In my experience, I have seen no ambiguity introduced by calling microtonal inflections "accidentals". IMO if the pages on interval regions are merged with diatonic categories, this should be merged with the main page on nominals and accidentals. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 09:23, 16 July 2025 (UTC)		I'd rather not create awkward separations between microtonal theory and standard music theory when they aren't necessary. In my experience, I have seen no ambiguity introduced by calling microtonal inflections "accidentals". IMO if the pages on interval regions are merged with diatonic categories, this should be merged with the main page on nominals and accidentals. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 09:23, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

			: I shared some opinions about the vocabulary on Discord, but I think the merge is justified no matter how the rest is treated. I will go ahead with the merge and tweak some bits to avoid assertions that makes things sound established when they aren't that much established. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:47, 17 July 2025 (UTC)