User talk:Unque/Barbershop Tuning Theory: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FilterNashi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Recommend addition to further reading sectiom |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
are you sure about 10:12:13:18 as a half-diminished chord? you are more likely talking about 6/5-13/9-9/5 which includes a blueish larger tritone 13/9 there. and it barely make sense in Otonal nor Utonal chords. and there are maybe more like 12:14:17:21 or something | == 10:12:13:18 == | ||
are you sure about 10:12:13:18 as a half-diminished chord? you are more likely talking about 6/5-13/9-9/5 which includes a blueish larger tritone 13/9 there. and it barely make sense in Otonal nor Utonal chords. and there are maybe more like 12:14:17:21 or something -- [[User:FilterNashi]]. | |||
: oops, i think you're right! i was thinking of 13/8 (not 13/9) as a sixth when rooting the chord as a 1-2-4-6 tetrad, which doesn't line up at all with the simple otonal structure in the rest of the chord. | |||
: it's fixed now; thank you for bringing this to my attention! | |||
[[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 02:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Video for 'further reading' == | |||
If you make a 'further reading' section, I recommend including this video on it: ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wmYEHOiIGY Barbershop Theory 7 - The Chords of Barbershop]'' | |||
It gives good audio and visual demonstrations of some of the chords discussed in this article. | |||
--[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 13:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:43, 21 May 2025
10:12:13:18
are you sure about 10:12:13:18 as a half-diminished chord? you are more likely talking about 6/5-13/9-9/5 which includes a blueish larger tritone 13/9 there. and it barely make sense in Otonal nor Utonal chords. and there are maybe more like 12:14:17:21 or something -- User:FilterNashi.
- oops, i think you're right! i was thinking of 13/8 (not 13/9) as a sixth when rooting the chord as a 1-2-4-6 tetrad, which doesn't line up at all with the simple otonal structure in the rest of the chord.
- it's fixed now; thank you for bringing this to my attention!
Unque (talk) 02:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Video for 'further reading'
If you make a 'further reading' section, I recommend including this video on it: Barbershop Theory 7 - The Chords of Barbershop
It gives good audio and visual demonstrations of some of the chords discussed in this article.
--BudjarnLambeth (talk) 13:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)