496edo: Difference between revisions

Adopt template: Factorization; misc. cleanup
Eliora (talk | contribs)
That "compound scale" is not really a temperament so moving accordingly
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox ET}}
{{Infobox ET}}
{{EDO intro|496}}
{{ED intro}}


496edo is [[enfactoring|enfactored]] in the 11-limit, with the same tuning as [[248edo]], but the [[patent val]]s differ on the mapping for 13. As such, in the 11-limit it [[support]]s a compound of two chains of 11-limit [[bischismic]] temperaments. In the 13-limit patent val, it tempers out [[4225/4224]].
== Theory ==
496edo is [[enfactoring|enfactored]] in the 11-limit, with the same tuning as [[248edo]], but the [[patent val]]s differ on the mapping for 13. In the 13-limit patent val, it tempers out [[4225/4224]].


496edo is good with the 2.3.11.19 [[subgroup]]. For higher limits, it has good approximations of [[31/1|31]], [[37/1|37]], and [[47/1|47]]. In the 2.3.11.19 subgroup, it tempers out 131072/131043.  
496edo is good with the 2.3.11.19 [[subgroup]]. For higher limits, it has good approximations of [[31/1|31]], [[37/1|37]], and [[47/1|47]]. In the 2.3.11.19 subgroup, it tempers out 131072/131043.  
Line 11: Line 12:
=== Subsets and supersets ===
=== Subsets and supersets ===
496 is the 3rd {{w|perfect number}}, factoring into {{factorization|496}}. Its nontrivial divisors are {{EDOs| 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248 }}, the most notable being 31.
496 is the 3rd {{w|perfect number}}, factoring into {{factorization|496}}. Its nontrivial divisors are {{EDOs| 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248 }}, the most notable being 31.
== Scales ==
Since 496edo is enfactored 248edo, in the 11-limit it can represent a [[compound scale|compound]] of two chains of 11-limit [[bischismic]] temperaments, interlaced.